Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 237 Guests are viewing this topic.

Zeitmaschine

I'm not very confident my previous equations considerations are entirely correct. Hence I will try it again:

There is a coil and a capacitor connected in a LC circuit resonating at a certain frequency. At zero crossing of the sine wave the inductance of the coil is changed to a quarter of its value. As a result the resonance frequency of the LC circuit doubles. This decreases the impedance of the capacitor by a factor of 2. Now the doubled frequency would increase the impedance of the coil by a factor of 2 but the coil's inductance was previously decreased by a factor of 4 so the impedance was decreased by a factor of 4 as well, hence the impedance of the coil is actually decreased by a factor of 2.

That would mean at zero crossing (when the energy transfer starts from the magnetic field in the coil to the electric field of the capacitor) the impedance of the coil and the capacitor is low (high frequency), whereas at peak (when the energy transfer starts from the electric field of the capacitor to the magnetic field of the coil) the impedance of the coil and the capacitor is high (low frequency).

Energy in C = switch to high impedance (transfer it slowly to L)
Energy in L = switch to low impedance (transfer it quickly to C)

Now someone any idea why this procedure should give additional energy?

In a LC circuit a capacitor is the counterpart of a coil. Both can store energy. But there is a major difference: A capacitor can store its charge for an infinite amount of time. A coil cannot.

Quote
He is telling to everyone once again that it is a tesla resonance transformer with just right tuning.
Then where is the Tesla patent of this transformer (which is so simple you will laugh)? Since Kapanadze uses semi-conductors for switching (transistors) for his transformer, then what was Tesla using? Tubes? Or just sparks? And if this is a Tesla resonance transformer then how could Kapanadze file a patent for it? Very strange. And even more strange, since the FBI had confiscated all Tesla notes then how can there be a note or patent describing a Tesla free energy device circulating in public?

Something must be wrong here ...  ???

leo48

QuoteLoad was on each phase 18 amp, total 54 am I right?

Is 31 are in when a portion of the current flowing in the other phase and already measured

On tri-phase system the power = V * I * 1.73

Is 1.73 is root squared of 3

Leo48


Every problem has always at least two solutions simply find
The strength of the strong is the ability to navigate struggles with eye serene

verpies

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on January 13, 2013, 04:30:29 PM
The impedance (apparent resistance) of L or C is (inversely) proportional to the frequency.
One is linearly proportional and the other is inversely proportional, albeit not linearly.

verpies

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on January 13, 2013, 04:30:29 PM
When the resonance frequency of the LC circuit is doubled because of a change in inductance of the coil (less inductance), then the impedance of the capacitor is halved and the impedance of the coil is doubled due to the frequency change in the circuit.
That's a conceptual error, that's why you get an infinite recursive feeling like the Penrose stairs.
In this case the impedance of the capacitor is not halved because there is no external source of AC current that the capacitor can resist/impede.
The concept of impedance makes sense only in reference to an external source of disturbance, such as a frequency generator and as an average magnitude over many cycles of periodic stimulating waveform.  It falls apart at e.g.: quarter cycle.

If you analyze the self-oscillations of an LCR circuit without an external signal generator or with a signal generator generating a long rectangular pulse (step pulse) then you should be using instantaneous  LCR transient analysis.

It is correct to analyze the transient states as the energy sloshing back and forth between the magnetic field of an inductor and electric field of a capacitor at different rates (depending on the values of the inductance and capacitance). Such analysis yields correct results.

verpies

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on January 13, 2013, 09:50:51 PM
In a LC circuit a capacitor is the counterpart of a coil. Both can store energy. But there is a major difference: A capacitor can store its charge for an infinite amount of time. A coil cannot.
Only because most practical coils are imperfect and possess resistance which dissipates the energy stored in them.  An ideal inductor can store energy in circulating current indefinitely.  Superconducting coils and atomic currents are examples of such perpetual energy storage.