Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Grumage]

NMR as a prime candidate for Modus Operandi?

Hi All, I posted this with Energetic Forum, it died a death, what do you think?

"My reason for this post. I first trawled the web to find out the NMR of Fe 56.
This apparently is 3.237778,Mhz but this value is related to magnetic field strength. The field strength being 2.35 Tesla. If one increases the field strength so increases the Resonant frequency.
Looking at it in the other direction, Global magnetic field strength taken as an average is around 50 micro Tesla and at that field strength the NMR of Fe56 is only 68Hz!!!!

With this in mind there is always going to be a shift in field strength due to the alternating nature of the Bias coil. It makes me wonder whether a softly softly approach is the answer?

It may also be the reason why someone quoted the phrase "you find the target, but it moves"

This was a little museing on my part but it might spark an idea, padon the pun!!!

Technical data provided by webelements.com and Geotech-LRLs-info-NMR"

How difficult could it be?, the answer seems like childs play to acheive, especially when you look at the diagrams of Patrick Kelly's E book.
Does the Iron require massive amounts of energy to start emitting beta particles? Or does it just happen once the resonant frequency is found?

What do you think?

[verpies]

NMR as a prime candidate for Modus Operandi?

Most readers of this thread do not subscribe to the NMR as the operating principle of some of the devices described here.

The strongest reason for this seems to be taking Tariel Kapanadze's words "It's so simple you'd laugh" at face value.
NMR is perceived by the readers as a very "not simple" process.

You'd have to use your own judgement to determine whether it is "simple" for you.

A "knee jerk" reaction to the "N" word appears to be another reason...

[Zeitmaschine]

The strongest reason for this seems to be taking Tariel Kapanadze's words "It's so simple you'd laugh" at face value.

This is not completely off-topic, but I have noticed that the Bessler Wheel is »so simple you'd laugh« too. It can rotate in both direction depending on the direction of the initial push given. That means it must be constructed symmetrically. That is the first hint. It needs a push to start and then it accelerates to approx. 26 RPM. That means it works on centrifugal force because it needs a little bit of centrifugal force to start and once started the acceleration stops as soon as the centrifugal force has reach a certain limit. That is the second hint. And of course the use of eighteenth century technology should be sufficient . That is the third hint

Hence who wants to attempt a working replication?

But now something completely off-topic: NASA's cold fusion tech could put a nuclear reactor in every home, car, and plane

So we should hurry up with our replication attempts (of something) otherwise NASA will win the race to cheap and clean power.

[NickZ]

  a.king21:
   As I could not post a picture of my the yoke on my reply PM to you, that I'm currently using, I had to upload it here. I also wanted to mention that the yoke had no windings directly on it, and so I wound it using 28gauge magnet wire, on both halves. One half of the secondary is used for lighting regular 120v incandescent, led, or Cfls, and I use both secondaries in series for lighting gutted bulbs.

[Farmhand]

Hi

Upper 2 section is clear for me, but what mean under 'toroid'? toroid ferrite ring? or this calc work just air cored ones? others lower section is not clear, maybe some, can u shot pic about filled by values, and post here, and 'little' explain what is what, please

No, no ferrite ring, that calculator is for "single layer air core solenoids" only. The toroid box is for the capacitance of the top"load" or top terminal, it could be a sphere or some other kind of capacitance (in pF), so a toroid with a 50 mm tube and a diameter of about 200 mm is about 6 to 8 pF as far as I can tell. If the coil ends with just a wire then i just put a really small value in there like 0.000001.

Then when the first three sections have values in the boxes next to the white writing click in one of the boxes in the next section and some results should be filled in.

It's useful because it tells us beforehand what the self capacitance of a coil and the self inductance of a coil will be as well as other things like frequency for H/D ratio and the effect of increasing the toroid/Terminal capacitance ect.

Here's another calculator to determine roughly the "Q" of a coil, it's not the best because it requires converting to nH and GHz.

http://www.circuitsage.com/tools/tool_view&tool_id=17

ie. there is a big difference in the Q of a coil wound with thicker wire. A coil with 1 Ohm resistance, 1.8 mH inductance and resonant at 780 KHz has a "Q" of about ( 8800 )
But if the coil was wound with thinner wire and had 20 Ohms resistance with 1.8 mH and resonant at 780 KHz it would have a "Q" of only ( 440 ). So much more energy would be wasted or the oscillations would die that much quicker ect.

Cheers