Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[gyulasun]

The video is only 36 min 25 sec long.
The end is cut off.
Refresh does not change it.
email me a copy of your original and I can try to post it on  you tube.
I sent you my email in a PM.
DonL

I find the same length as Don.  I noticed that whenever I refresh the video url in my browser, the total lenght is shown as 49 minute and 43 seconds but within  a second the length time changes to 36:25 
Perhaps reuploading it again may cure this problem.

Gyula

[Farmhand]

he he he actually it's not simple.... energy COMES from power supply but precisely from resonant circuit, but you cannot tap it without proper methods and that is why one wire energy transfer......

but you didn't comprehended that I already said all you should know for start : reactive power ratio to real power or so called Q factor become your COP is you realize Kapanadze like devices.....
that's my theory.....     have you ever wondered if transformer could work quite different then we think ?

The ratio of Reactive power to real power isn't the "Q" it's the power factor.  A high Q transformer could have a low power factor.
Which is why I think we should make an effort to distinguish between tank "activity" and reactive power. Reactive power is related
to power factor and coil "Q" is related to the resistance, inductance ect. of a coil or it's ability to oscillate when pinged or it's ability
to maintain activity after input stops, I think.

But if you were right then the best power factor that can be got is 1.00 so the best efficiency would be C.O.P 1.

please, do you have ANY STRONG proof that initial energy of transformer primary circuit IS TRANSFORMED into energy in secondary ?! 

Do you have any strong evidence that the initial energy of the transformer primary circuit IS NOT TRANSFORMED into energy in secondary ?

Here's a thought, the energy supplied to the primary via wires causes a current through the primary which causes the transfer of energy via induction
to the secondary and the energy leaving the primary via wires is less than the energy that enters, the energy leaving the secondary via wires is more
than the energy that enters by wire's (none usually) The energy leaving the secondary had to come from somewhere so where else would it come from
except from the supply via the primary by way of induction ?

Why is there a direct relationship between the volts and amperes in the transformation ? eg. with a 10:1 ratio transformer, 100 volts at 10 amps becomes 10 volts at 100 amperes.

Seems all a bit too much to be a coincidence and to need to looking for other explanations seems redundant.

Cheers

[Farmhand]

But nevertheless it is a Faraday cage. Maybe it damps some vibrations too as a side effect.

Tin Can Cage

Aluminum Boxes Cage

Complete Room Cage

Stepanov Cage

That's a lot of Faraday cages given the assertion no Faraday cage is needed. No one connects aluminum boxes to ground with special made brass strips without any reason. No one shields the whole room with expensive copper mesh without any reason.

If someone says a Faraday cage is definitely not needed, then he should prove it by presenting a working device without the use of a Faraday cage.

And yes, the Kapanadze device is a Tesla »invention« but it has nothing to do with the classical Tesla coil. That's just a Kapanadze decoy. It has something to do with Tesla's shielded under water tank. This tank was never patented by Tesla (or the patent has vanished).

Furthermore, the mysterious box in Tesla's Electric Car was reported to have 12 vacuum tubes inside. Wouldn't it be strange that one sees the 12 tubes inside the box (another Faraday cage) but missed to see (and report) the classical Tesla coil inclusive a spark gap inside (or outside) the box?

BTW, isn't it striking: As soon as this thread tends towards a Faraday cage someone comes along and says »nah«.

Going by the thought process in bold above.

If someone says a Faraday cage definitely is needed then he should present a working device with the use of a Faraday cage. And

If someone says anything is definitely needed or definitely not needed they should present a working device to show it with or without the said thing. That is your reasoning.

Did it ever occur to you the Faraday cage might be to reduce interference to radio traffic or TV signal or just a shield in general to reduce unwanted radiations from interfering
with stuff in an unwanted way ? Many people do use them for that purpose.

Cheers

[Zeitmaschine]

Did it ever occur to you the Faraday cage might be to reduce interference to radio traffic or TV signal or just a shield in general to reduce unwanted radiations from interfering
with stuff in an unwanted way ? Many people do use them for that purpose.

In this case the Tesla coil and the spark gap should be inside the shielding not outside of it, like in 2004 and green box video. An unshielded spark gap means TK did not care about unwanted radiations. But however he cared about shielding.

[wasabi]

You were muted for saying that your only purpose was to harrass me

Please do not put your words in my proverbial mouth.
I never wrote that my purpose was to harass you.  I only wrote that my purpose is to oppose you.  There is a huge difference as there is nothing wrong in scientific opposition.
See the quote below:

My purpose is to oppose you, and specifically the unfounded theories you weave so verbosely.

I know who you are Verpies/wasabi/whoever you need to be.

For what it's worth, I am not Verpies. We only work at the same institution and we are not friends.

I'd be happy to reply to all of the sentences in your last message but you'd most likely go crying to Stefan again.

Anyway, I predict that now the hot topic in this thread will be Wesley's energy from matter in that Coler tube, not "energy from vacuum" nor Tesla magic, so now nobody will be even interested in reading my posts opposing your statements about this stuff.