Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

Thank You  Sparks for material from your post.

hello stivep and congratulations for your successful experiment, but would you explain is there a some connection between your conception and that of the Andrea Rossi and his reactor of cold nuclear fusion?, thanks in advance!

The Magic of Mr. Rossi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtQJyHKVuio


Yes I see connection  between Andrea Rossi and my experiment.
Andrea Rossi stays about  secret ingredient additive  for his device to work
Andrea Rossi use aluminium foil around  his device- from the perspective of Calorimetry  in terms of  heat conservation, this foil is a joke so what would be another reason to  use aluminium foil well resaonable suspicion would be Beta  radiation.
By that token if say compound (substance) is non radioactive that Colman 1956 would be explanation for it .............
Why?
  because Rossi and   original patent of  Edison  in my video Revolution has begun Free Energy Exposed   part 3 shows nickel as part of   compound used by  Hendershot.
Colman does not use Nickel - different method of extraction  -that is only what you looking for   essence of it.
And I have seen it as early version of  Hendershot   later Colman  stating that 110V at 10A= 1.1kW for 30 milligrams only!!
is to be extracted from glass tube of 5mm inside diameter and 45mm long with assuming 14 layers of compound
If cobalt is one of initiators of this process along  with phosphates (phosphorus  based)
Than if it happened that we take Coleman heat eruption ( not utilized by Colman) as factor  of Rossi process but triggered by Beta radiation  than we have answer to Andrea Rossi secret.
Worse it  comes that if the secret additive  will be proven as not included in the patent than he is in trouble.


But maybe  he  hided  secret ingredient  being afraid that before he gets  big money his patent will be in denial by the reason to Colman priority rights.


By analyzing Rossi  and Colman we might see just different way of extracting energy
That explain different structure and different additives to the compound
For Rossi Temperature is dominating factor.


Wesley




PS: recent edition that might help to identify not only Rossi but TK as well
There you go - here is your Beta radiation supported by evidence of aluminium foil  used to stop it.
look at video link you will find it.
first picture is  ludlum from ebay
the two last are Rossi toys.
I hate to ruin anyone business but F... it.
It looks like Rossi will have problem with  money earning
by patent rights priority of Colman.

I will never support anyone who thinks money only f you.
give something and than make A LOT  OF  money  on IT ALONG WITH OTHERS  that IS FAIR AND ONLY FAIR
THE COMPETITION WILL EAT YOU UP - THAT IS GOOD......... YOU  WILL MAKE YOUR PROFIT ANYHOW BUT PRODUCT WILL BE AFFORDABLE

[verpies]

I believe the EM enviroment affects the stability of the entire atom.  When the wavelength of a photon is short enough it can cause ionization of the atom or it can cause radioactive decay of the neucleus.   The photon 1/4wavelength has to be in angstroms.  A longer wavelength and the intensity of the wave has to be increased to elicit the same effects.

Notice that even 300 meter photons (MHz) can affect the nuclei, when the nucleus is immersed in weak DC magnetic field.  See here.

[forest]

It only matters if there is gamma or neutron radiation released, right ? I have found difficult to test for any kind of radiation for a DYI  device kind like TK has made for example.  Once I proposed to use photographic paper in black envelope with a pieces of lead or other solid metal plates in various shapes. Put a device into a container and glue to  each wall such envelope then run device for a few days. In case of neutron radiation the results are not reliable even if you fill container with water....  
What do you think about it , stiveip , verpies?

[x_name41]

thank you Stevep and would have been well incidentally to contact (if there is a such a possibility of course) with the itself Andrea Rossi for discussion of some possibilities and etc.

[verpies]

Yes, neutron and gamma are the worst.
When beta particles are shielded with heavy elements (e.g. Pb) it is worse than shielding them with light elements (e.g. Al) because heavy elements convert beta particles to X-Ray radiation through Bremsstrahlung effect. However Pb is better for shielding gamma radiation.

Yes, you can differentiate between beta and gamma with a highISO photo film with and without aluminum foil.  See here.

Neutrons are much harder to detect.
The CdCl₂ that Wesley uses, is good at catching slow neutrons and converting them to gamma.