Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[FreeEnergyInfo]

www.realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/108060-generatory-kapanadze-obshhaya-tema.html?limit=18&start=1332#122014

[verpies]

Start translation:
To shake atoms so they render the energy they contain, you must send via a high !important frequency oscillator (in the order of 173 kHz) a wave that is in resonance with the vibration of the copper electrodes. This is via an  !important]oscillating  magnetic field thanks to the   !important]coil winding  that is connected to the oscillator and that covers the copper. One part of the feed current is used to polarize the metal that restitutes (gives back) up to 30 times the energy consumed by the oscillator.
End translation

It appears that the common points between the Colman patent and that french Michael Meyer patent, are:
1) Copper as the Gain Medium
2) RF stimulation
3) Polarization of the Gain Medium (magnetic or electric)

Note, that the frequency of the RF stimulation in the Meyer patent is ~1800 times lower than the frequency in the Colman patent.
Thus, the Gain Medium in the Mayer device will not experience much of the harmful skin-effect (self-shielding). 
Also, it is interesting to note, that incidentally, an electron is ~1800 times smaller than a proton.

However, if the Gain Medium in the Colman device is made electrically non-conductive, its high resistance will also decrease the bad skin-effect, despite the high RF frequency (>300MHz).

It would be interesting to learn whether the DC resistance of the copper in Colman tube changes after heating.
If the resistance increases, then it would be an indication of chemical surface passivation.

P.S.
Michael Meyer's 1998 czech patent (CZ284333) illustrates yet another method of obtaining energy from transmutation.
In this patent the Gain Medium is an Iron rod and the frequency of RF stimulation is 21MHz.  The Iron rod is magnetically saturated in order to minimize its permeability (contrastingly, copper and zinc in the other patents, already have minimal permeability).

[Qwert]

http://www.overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/msg84558/#msg84558

Also, something about excitation some mterials:
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/otto/ottos-open-tpu/ottotpu.pdf

[Farmhand]

It appears that the common points between the Colman patent and that french Michael Meyer patent, are:
1) Copper as the Gain Medium
2) RF stimulation
3) Polarization of the Gain Medium (magnetic or electric)

Note, that the frequency of the RF stimulation in the Meyer patent is ~1800 times lower than the frequency in the Colman patent.
Thus, the Gain Medium in the Mayer device will not experience much of the harmful skin-effect (self-shielding). 
Also, it is interesting to note, that incidentally, an electron is ~1800 times smaller than a proton.

However, if the Gain Medium in the Colman device is made electrically non-conductive, its high resistance will also decrease the bad skin-effect, despite the high RF frequency (>300MHz).

It would be interesting to learn whether the DC resistance of the copper in Colman tube changes after heating.
If the resistance increases, then it would be an indication of chemical surface passivation.

P.S.
Michael Meyer's 1998 czech patent (CZ284333) illustrates yet another method of obtaining energy from transmutation.
In this patent the Gain Medium is an Iron rod and the frequency of RF stimulation is 21MHz.  The Iron rod is magnetically saturated in order to minimize its permeability (contrastingly, copper and zinc in the other patents, already have minimal permeability).

Hi Verpies, I would think the 173 kHz of the copper method would be more in the reach of most of us.

Is there any stringent requirements for the experiment except the frequency ? Is a certain type of copper needed or anything ?

Seems like someone should be able to show something if it does work. Any tips for the coil design or how much power should be input ?

I'm not asking for any hard facts, just you're opinion.

I remember reading the document on it before, looks like there is a patent to read.

Cheers

P.S. Is there any translation to English of the French document ? Or am I missing it ?

Or is there a patent for the copper method ?

..

[jbignes5]

Wait is this not what I have been suggesting and TK is doing the whole time? Excitation of the copper to output more then it takes to cause the excitation. The gain medium is the impulse across the gap. The exciter is around a copper coil connected to a load. Wow so now that you have found a French patent that says the same thing you give credence to what I have been saying the whole time and TK has been doing.


Wow talk about bringing up the same exact method and then saying look what I thought of...