Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

Free-energy technology is not meant to be controlled by vain and greedy parasites who wish to use a gift from God to exploit their fellow man. Free-energy technology represents a spiritual transition of the human race. Free-energy is not meant to be owned, period!

And then Paul Raymond Jensen forgot to make a detailed drawing and a video of his working unidirectional transformer or at the least a few significant photographs. Therefore today free-energy technology is still controlled by vain and greedy parasites who wish to use a gift from God to exploit their fellow man, period!

[T-1000]

Hi T-1000

You are right person (because you are was witness), who can answer for us because we cant decide the real input consumption, in video your friend calc on paper 3,4 Watts, but your ammeter showed 30 Amp on 0,5A switched state, if I good know that is 0,15A on 230 Volts is 34,5Watts, right? or no?
2. question we cant decide the 100Watts bulb was run on full bright, because trough the camera its hard to believe, yes or no? (two same bulb one for FE and second one for the grid, side by side, better for real proof, what you thing about this, my friend?)

best regards zcsaba77

The electronics of flyback driving circuit was powered by 220V / 300mA. If flyback was connected to capacitors with spark gap only they was drawing up to 340mA.
The additional 14mA was consumed when coil-capacitor with load was attached to it.

So now you can calculate yourself

[Haan]

Mechanical antigravity:
Just for the record - I did this 30 years ago, but shelved it when I realized the USA had it electronically.
It works by deflecting Newton's "equal and opposite" reaction by 90 degrees so more force goes up than down.


There - the secret exposed. Enjoy.

a.king21,
was your mechanical approach similar to Eric Laithwaite's ideas about gyroscopes?.

[magpwr]

The electronics of flyback driving circuit was powered by 220V / 300mA. If flyback was connected to capacitors with spark gap only they was drawing up to 340mA.
The additional 14mA was consumed when coil-capacitor with load was attached to it.

So now you can calculate yourself

Hi T-1000,

May i ask have you measured the voltage on bulb while in operation via coil-capacitor .Is it around 200volts at least.

I'm already aware through video there is still room for improvement for driver stage.I will be improving on the driver stage to simply things a lot more.
I have already got the plans in my head at this moment.

I'm also suspecting there is loses from HV diode through video which i understand 15KV 0.5Amp spec was used in experiment shown in video.For this i have already purchased 40KV 1Amp with 100ns latency to eliminate the possibility of leakage via REVERSAL since HV transformer from observed spark is likely supplying around 30KV...40KV.The diode used in experiment shown in video might be underrated.
This is just my personnel theory/findings.

Kindly provide me your feedback.

[T-1000]

Hi T-1000,

May i ask have you measured the voltage on bulb while in operation via coil-capacitor .Is it around 200volts at least.

I'm already aware through video there is still room for improvement for driver stage.I will be improving on the driver stage to simply things a lot more.
I have already got the plans in my head at this moment.

I'm also suspecting there is loses from HV diode through video which i understand 15KV 0.5Amp spec was used in experiment shown in video.For this i have already purchased 40KV 1Amp with 100ns latency to eliminate the possibility of leakage via REVERSAL since HV transformer from observed spark is likely supplying around 30KV...40KV.The diode used in experiment might be underated.
This is my personnel theory/findings.

We did not risk to measure voltage after secondary spark gap.
The driver circuit was running flyback transformer on its resonant frequency.
The diodes was underrated because it was too expensive for having right ones for high voltage and high frequency.
There was 40kV+ in D. Smith style secondary coils due 1:5 ratio of wire length between Caduceus primary and secondary coils. The optimal ratio would be 1:4 but we must to have same physical mass of material in all secondaries together as it is on primary coil (read N. Tesla notes about this).