Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[x_name41]

hello I will post here my idea of a economically and compact pocket flashlight with arc lamp. the idea is to use arc discharge a plasma as a conductor providing closure to the resonant circuit, and so in this way energy is being exchanged between L and C and passing through the lamp . I applied two different principles (such as options) in the flashlight. in common is that in both is used resonance!. first principle schematic (option) is a using the method of Nikola Tesla (miniature Kapanadze generator) and second principle schematic (option) is through a "current of the conduction" so to speak . of that picture is depicted very very old scheme of a "arc comverter" (arc transmitter)

[leo48]

 

I found the files of these documents but are in Cyrillic
http://kuasar.narod.ru/library/tesla/energ.htm
Leo48

[ARMCORTEX]

Hello, I used to have an account here but that was long ago, now I have a job in embedded programming and am always too lazy after work to fully go through the forums theories, but someday I'll regret not pulling the trigger on a project of over-energy.

00, I thank you for the nice diagrams and theories you bring, if its not expensive and all is layed out in 3D then what is there to complain about. My beef is with hoaxsters like Bob Boyce who invents stories and makes people loose precious time and $$, that's just like breaking somebody's car window to get  a quarter and a few pennies.

Mins I ask you tho, Ok I understand that we have a magnetic structure, or material. On this substance dc and ac are superimposed, and a nuclear effect is created, this effect must be ""channelled'' via correct field positioning.

3 dimensionally, where do you think those fields meet, how must I harness this. I see all those pretty diagrams everywhere but in 3d I still cannot grasp. Show me signal waveform, 3d arrangement and I will try.

thx you.

[v8karlo]

Vladimir Utkin
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/VladimirUtkin2.htm

Wesley

Dear Wesley,

After reading Utkin's document on Kapanadze issue about emitter and receiver I stumbled on an article about method of receiving high wattage from distant emitter. (In Kapanadze case emitter and receiver are in close proximity).


Vladimir Utkin's explanation of Kapanadze device:

(http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Utkin/Fig14.gif)

(http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Utkin/Fig13.gif)


The name of article is"Energy Sucking" antennas, tiny devices receive high wattage (whole article is in the pdf attached)

Part from article:

TRANSMIT IN ORDER TO RECEIVE?!!! Rather than relying upon the wiggling electrons in the wires of the large half-wave antenna to generate EM fields... what if we used use a power supply instead?  If an antenna is 1/10,000 wavelength across, we should be able to force it to behave as if it's huge; perhaps 1/3 wavelength across. We simply have to drive it hard with an RF source.  We must drive it at the *same* frequency as the incoming waves, then adjust the phase and amplitude of the power supply to a special value.  At one particular value, our transmissions will cause the antenna to be best at absorbing the incoming waves.
Take a loop antenna as an example. If we want our little loop-antenna to receive far more radio energy than it normally would, then we need to produce a large AC current in the antenna coil, where the phase of this current is locked in synch with the waves we wish to receive, and is lagging by 90 degrees. The voltage across the antenna terminals stays about the same as when an undriven antenna receives those waves.  However, since the current is much higher in the driven antenna, the energy received per second is much higher as well.  This seems like engineering blasphemy, no?  How can adding a larger current increase the RECEIVED power?  And won't our receiving antenna start transmitting?  Yet this actually does work. Power equals volts times amps.  To increase the RF power received from distant sources, we increase the antenna's amperes intentionally.

This sounds really silly.  How can we improve the reception of an electrically small antenna by using it to *transmit*? The secret involves the cancellation of magnetic or electric fields in the near-field region of the antenna. The physics of the nearfield region of antennas has a kind of nonlinearity because conductors are present.  In the electromagnetic nearfield region, it's possible to change the "E" of a wave without changing the "M"  (change the antenna's voltage without changing the current), and vice versa.  Superposition of EM traveling waves does not quite apply here because the ruling equations for energy propagation near conductors depends upon V^2 or I^2 separately.  In addition, V is almost independent of I in the near-field region.  If a very small loop antenna (a coil) should happen to receive a radio wave as a very small signal, we can increase the received *energy* by artificially increasing the current. Or if we're using a tiny dipole antenna (a capacitor,) we can increase the short dipole's received energy by applying a large AC voltage across the antenna terminals. 



Whole article is in pdf attached.

[forest]

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-books-tesla-fuelless-generator-by-oliver-nichelson?PHPSESSID=f3bbed31f8b03b69a31200e2833daf8e;


you can buy it