Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

do you have more of it?
What next one  needs to do?






Wesley

Yeah just look at the video I showed. The coils around the radiator should be grounded on one end and then lead to your load. In the case of this driver transformer there should be a negative wire and a separate positive wire. In the rf version these will alternate back an forth much like traditional AC system. The bifilar harvest coils should be enough capacitance to act like Tesla's top loads. So mini Tesla coils for each phase.


I don't have it all worked out but that is as complete as I have gotten. We must start looking into this and that means building the transformers and bifilar ground tap coils.


Lets think of it like this: No matter how many times you strike a tuning fork it still rings at it's resonant frequency right? Well that is kinda what is happening to the bifilar coils. This is why Akula was showing the two towers and how they differed. One driven (Tesla coil) and the other passive but still rung by the Tesla tower emissions. Hmmm... Wow thats interesting isn't it... This is where the guessing happens until I get my lab up....

The smaller box is the cap I assume.. That too has to be custom made and oil filled. You know the one that the 9v battery connects to.

[gyulasun]

Magnetic Spin Waves...

The FS Loop Antenna  proof of concept for spin-fields
within Ferrite Sleeve inductors.


http://gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm

http://www.am-dx.com/antennas/FSL%20Antenna%20Design%20Optimization.htm

"One of those pieces of hardware is a coil. It has a ferrite core and a trick winding on it. To look at it, it looks like a rather oddly wound inductor. When measured on a radio-frequency bridge, however, it shows some very peculiar properties. There are certain frequencies at which it is impossible to balance the r.f. bridge, and that is a direct contradiction to what any electrical engineer will tell you should happen with a coil of wire wound on a ferrite core. Now if we take this coil and we excite it with radio frequency energy at or near these critical frequencies, we find that energy goes into the coil and nothing comes out. It just disappears. As a matter of fact we had one coil about an inch in diameter and eight inches long and we poured a kilowatt into that coil for two hours from a kilowatt communications-type transmitter. The coil was in a two-inch brass tube with a plate welded on one end and a transmission line fitting on the other. We could find no radiation around the outside of that tube at all. In other words the energy went in; none came out. The information which we got from the boys topside was that we were actually making tenser energy, which is a six-dimensional radio wave, and it is a type of energy they use extensively for radio communications, transmission of power and for pushing and pulling. In fact they use it for just about everything that we can think of. We were not able to control this energy; we could just make it. We are hoping that later on we will be able to learn how to do it, but at the present time we are just not smart enough."

Wilbert B. Smith  1961...

Hi Acca,

You refer to two links above on ferrite sleeve antennas and under the links then you quote a text from Wilbert B. Smith.

My understanding is that the quote from Wilbert Smith does not refer to the ferrite sleeve antenna coil. I know you did not write that it refers to it but I do think a clarification is in order.

So the coils wound for the ferrite sleeve antennas in your two links and shown in the picture your attached are normal single layer coils while the coil in Wilbert Smith's text is mentioned as a "trick winding" (an oddly wound inductor).  To put it otherwise, it is the caduceus coil which has "some very peculiar properties", tested first probably by Wilbert Smith back in the 1960's.

Here is shown such caduceus coil and how it is wound, tested by Naudin: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/smithcl.htm   

Greetings,  Gyula

[jbignes5]

 To make the distinction between the two methods of using the transformer this might help to understand it.


" In connection with the coil I use either the ordinary form of discharger or a modified form.  In the former I have introduced two changes which secure some advantages, and which are obvious.  If they are mentioned, it is only in the hope that some experimenter may find them of use."

The magnetic disrupter (picture 1) is for the impulse form and the multiple gaps (picture 2) is for the traditional AC form.

Reference:

http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/coloradonotes/coloradonotes04.htm


Again I would like to stress the method Tesla used to get this information out there. It was never released in one single patent or document. He did this to make sure it was released without tipping off the norms. The patents were single aspects of a whole device and not all of the patents had this information. So you have to make the connection then collect the data from each patent or source to form the whole device.
Again this was a Tesla tactic and was the way he operated. He tried to focus on each aspect to learn as much as possible for that particular  aspect.

Also for the one that pointed out that Tesla said what he meant. I beg to differ with that. It is never more obvious then what he said above... He called the oscillator a coil so that ends that right?

[jbignes5]

Wow ask and you receive.


Here is someone actually doing the work. Although he is almost all right there are a few things we need to explore more.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px14OF1D3EA

Great job TheOldScientist!

[a.king21]

Wow ask and you receive.


Here is someone actually doing the work. Although he is almost all right there are a few things we need to explore more.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px14OF1D3EA

Great job TheOldScientist!

Great Post. We're almost there. Notice he said the bifilar pickup coil coil needs hardly any tuning. Just as Akula said.
So we now know that in the Kapanadze setup coil 1 is ordinary; coil 2 is bifilar. Also the old scientist's bifilar looks to have a  core.