Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: Khwartz on November 11, 2013, 09:11:52 PM
No! I know other models can and are used with much effectiveness! But it doesn't mean that we can not do better with the "substantial" viewpoint I have chosen to follow.
...I am very sad to see you could have gone so low!
I know I should respect another viewpoint, but it is very hard for me when I see the underlying conceptual error in plain sight.  It is like seeing some child struggle with that 9-dot puzzle that needs to be connected with 4 lines and seeing the error he makes over and over, knowing that he will never solve that puzzle that way.  It would be very hard to be respectful towards such error and treat it as "another point of view".  My dilemma is similar.

Quote from: Khwartz on November 11, 2013, 09:11:52 PM
The ONLY infantile is The One who treat others of infantile and can not accept others to have others point of view!
I am very sad to see you could have gone so low! :(
Well deserved.  I apologize if I offended you with the phrase "infantile paradigm". Perhaps I should have used the words like: simplistic, routine, common, fashionable, trendy, ubiquitous, etc...  I meant no malice - it's just that I had this discussion so many times that I am getting exasperated with repetition.  You're just an unlucky guy that came as last to that discussion...

Please distinguish a discussion about a different point of view from a discussion about a conceptual error that is well known to one party.  I've been there, done that 23 years ago when I was that proverbial pup trying to solve that 9-dot puzzle.

Quote from: Khwartz on November 11, 2013, 09:11:52 PM
I can understand and accept this idea, especially if you see photons as pure particles,
I don't see them as particles nor waves and I don't see them as traveling through space nor Aether but I understand how they can appear to do so.

Quote from: Khwartz on November 11, 2013, 09:11:52 PM
"Waves of what?"
There is no answer to this, because in this question you falsely assume waves.

Quote from: Khwartz on November 11, 2013, 09:11:52 PM
"Changes of what?" in the space if the space has nothing inside?
There are no such changes in space as you are asking for. This question indicates to me, that you did not take my comment to heart and you are still stuck in that bleeping 3D/1D paradigm (s3/t1).
Space as you know it is just an emergent 3D geometric reference system created by motion of gravitating observers through projective geometry
As a reference system space cannot be curved or distorted or have waves in it.  Yes, Einstein would turn in his grave if he could read that...

Do you really want to discuss such stuff on OU forum?
Most people here will not understand it anyway and soon start objecting to too much abstraction and too little engineering....and they probably would be correct.

captainkt


@Сергей В. I suppose after watching the UDT transformer doubters will still ask where does the energy come from? So all we need to do is scale up from this. The core is just a chopped up iron transformer core, small angle grinder with a 1mm thin blade will cut any shape out of an old MOT transformer in minutes, so cheap to make. Lets go!Regards
Keith

Сергей В.

The same UDT transformer but this time from Russian replicator. It was 16 June.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17QMaJ8GRm0

Complete schematic and coils data i have gave couple a months before !! And who was replicated here ??

Several working schematics from Tiger2007 checked and verified i have posted here and who was replicated ??

NOBODY and NO ONE !! Why ?? Simple nobody need Free Energy !!

Only neverending stories and flood.  !!  Same worth for Russian Realstrannik and American Energetic forum. Million theories without health logic and good sense like Tesla said or pissing on the lizards like Eric Dollard said !!

What should i said any more ??

Last one was Akula0083 who gave all for Free of charge. And what he get instead ?? Maximum trolling and pissing on him on every step. That is reality !! Every new Free Energy device was pissed in same day in which has appeared on forums. This is not normal for human beings to piss on all around. It's mind distortion of sick parasitic civilization.

No more comments !!

captainkt

@ So all, is the Kapanadze transformer in the bedroom device just an up scaled UDT  transformer the rest is bling. The diodes do look strangely connected, and is the reason Kapanadze did not want this particular vid to go public the fact that the secret is in full veiw and in all other devices the tranformer is suddenly hidden in a box of some kind, and we are shown a strange coil setup as the main component. In the bedroom vid we have a transformer thats been tampered with, diodes, and two caps in full veiw. The start up procedure is also exactly the same on all Kapa devises small load then switch on big load. If this is not done he does a re start with his small 9volt battery, this is clear on most of his demo's. So it is possible that his secret resonator is a larger UDT transformer well out of sight. After all it does not matter which part of the circuit is OU, the start the middle or the end. Another observation moving on to Don Smith, when larger wattage bulbs were fitted at a demo his device acted similar to the UDT transformer and adjusted itself after a second or so.
Regards
Keith

captainkt

 
                              @Сергей В. Thanks for this,I have been led up the garden path by this forumn and tried for years to replicate all kinds of devises . Now seriously everyone this looks to be the right direction, so no trolls please lets just do it!