Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[a.king21]

example:
40; 80; 120; 500; 1000 kHz

its reason because I want to know how deep inside bulb in wolfram tread, I watched one of Igor's video, he immerse to water fully and take out and again immerse, if bulb rise normaly like on use main power, 200-300w bulb raise temperature inmediatly, and his bulb glass not broke/explode in water, I think bulb on HF produce less heat, but it is my theory, maybe wrong

Igor says it is a fake.
There are hidden thin wires.
Thin wires can only handle the current to light the bulb if they are high voltage and high frequency in my experience.
At high frequencies and high voltages you enter the realm of cold electricity, and resistive load light bulbs behave differently in those circumstances.
Tesla showed this in many of his patents from 1891 onwards.

[d3x0r]

Not really we can have high voltage without current and hi current without voltage, neither can do work without the other, its a combination of both.

Current still doesn't reverse; if it did, added negative particles to positive wouldn't help ... your current arrows are indicating electrons moving towards positive; wouldn't happen... and if it did, it's not what would be wanted; would defeat charging of a cap that was used instead of a battery....


'sides your current is going opposed to the diode... wouldn't even reach the charge battery.

[stivep]

Yes, but that is beside the point.
The point was that "back EMF" does not cause the current through the inductor to flow backwards (if it is allowed to flow at all).

I agree with Verpies. There is no such  thing as current without voltage and reverse.
does not exists  never existed and will never exist.
However due to electrostatic potential difference - there is so many " weird " things that  I would love to  analyze.
I stated in  my video  describing electrostatic pump  theory- that delay time mechanism is responsible  for energy accumulation due to  inertia of the mass in flow.
I'm trying to point something that  nobody cares to understand.


Acceleration and comparison of force vectors.



step1.  Take car at 0 speed= 15 girls push.
step2.  Take car at speed that requires one girl
step3.  Take car at speed that requires 1 finger of the girl to sustain  the motion.( that finger compensates the loses)
step4.  Take car at speed that requires 1 finger of the girl to sustain  the motion with 4 people inside ( that  finger compensates the loses as well with the same joules force applied.
The only difference  is what has happened before it gets to that point, That means initial power to push the car to that point- must of be greater, but after that it,is not important for sustaining the motion if we heave 1 or 4 or 10 people in the car.There always would be a point where one finger of 15 years old girl will compensate the losses. Acceleration  if any at any vector of forces will be at some point no longer present, but will be  at the " finger level for sure"


It is not important that we  deal with car, flying will,  electrical current versus electrical potential(V) 
The system will obey the same  "function mechanism" in time


What is-Delay Time Line:



So what than square signal does?
I creates  temporary acceleration as BEMF is not seen immediately but with delay.
Similar to the bank teller holding  pack of dollars in his hand  and being at that fraction of time "in possession of that money"
She can put it to flow, or theoretically he can go to pizza  store to buy  energy, or get the car rental , to borrow energy... in any  scenario he is not paying with his own "money" (with his own potential).
The balance will come later.


Another example:
Can you just concentrate  guys for the moment?
Car is standing  in between two bumps with its rear tire  front wheel drive)
Car on the bump- if pushed with force F, however it does not  go over the bump.
Than car is pushed back to go on rear bump with force F than forward with force F and than with 1/10 of force  F is going over the bump as it already has swing power of time based  acceleration.
result:
So in practice one can use 1/10 of Force F, and increasing frequency to swing the car, swing the bridge, (swing his  attention to understand  simple  physics) 




Madoff's ponzi scheme was possible because of the same mechanism, but Madoff used "constant acceleration" to the point at  no more compensation from new investors.

So why FE device  works?
It uses someone energy, with addition of small  compensating energy to sustain  phenomena.
Like square impulses on the top of sinusoide.
or
Like 10" water pipe with water when flowing charging "capacitor" whose energy is  used to release  the valve holding it from flow. And the only outside energy could be  the 15 years  old girl pressing button with one finger, or just timer circuit doing it  automatically when charged from the same source.


So initial energy, or energy of water flowing is  what we do not care about  let's someone  pay for it( gravity,river stream, sun, wind, )
We add some to it  to start the process and than  let it go...in controllable fashion.


So what would happened if we accelerate system ( any system) to the point where additive  energy could be so small  that by means of resonance( in our case) we would be able to employ appropriate source to compensate it?
One of the simulators- compensators could be Americium 241 of smoke detector   ionizating  spark gap .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8GlzUjYazs
 




Wesley

[andrea76]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJimMDrmwrM&list=PLO6FJVqlxatdprKQA1BhrJCML2tbomVJ2

[TinselKoala]

Power is not energy.

Resistive elements convert electrical power to heat, by the relation P (in watts) = I²R. Low currents mean low heat dissipation by the resistive elements.

Lots of different kinds of motors will NOT produce a high-current, overheating state when stalled by heavy shaft loads. The ordinary attraction or repulsion Pulse Motor is one such type, the Steorn core-effect pulse motor another.

It's true that the video is just a "news article" and is largely journalistic hype, and without knowing more details, it's not possible to evaluate all the claims made by the narrator. But if he really thinks he's discovered a "new type of energy" or he thinks he's working with "cold electricity" which is different somehow from "regular electricity"... he's just wrong. He's discovered high voltage, low current, high frequency AC.... what a miracle.