Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[DilJalaay]

Hello and good day,
Thanks for the posting great stuff.


Here what i found.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBmqrOZZ7Xc


A man doing this with 3 batteries.
He said that he upload other videos.


But i did not find it. Can some one Link more videos from this guy?


Thanks and regards.

D.J

[Dave45]

Right... but whether your arrows represent one flow or the other (and I thought we had decided ground to positive was the common direction for an arrow)  In one drawing your arrow is with the diode, and the other it's against the diode, so again it couldn't reach that potential...


and since the circuit does work; maybe it's that the current doesn't reverse in the coil...

The current goes against the diode, voltage with the diode, neither change direction, I know this is not the accepted theory and it may be wrong but it helps me understand the reactions of a coil.

When we pulse a coil in just and ordinary transformer we'r hitting the coil 180 degree's out of phase(each side of the coil winding) with 120 cycles but the voltage on the scope shows 60 cycles with a 90 degree phase shift and the current also has a 90 degree phase shift at 60 cycles, a coil separates voltage and amperage or pos and neg however you want to look at it.

These are just observations and probably arent correct but I will entertain this view and the classical view, I believe it pays to be open minded in my search.

I know I'll get trashed over this post but Im just stating what some are thinking and you see Im just an old country boy my tenure was up along time ago  lol

Im not afraid to be wrong I have nothing to prove
Some of us are smart and some just have common sense
Lets keep up the search

Evil prevails when good men do nothing.

[verpies]

example:  40; 80; 120; 500; 1000 kHz

99.3% attenuation skin depth for Tungsten (Wolfram):

  40kHz: 3.0mm
  80kHz: 2.1mm
120kHz: 1.7mm
500kHz: 0.8mm
   1MHz: 0.6mm

[d3x0r]

The current goes against the diode, voltage with the diode, neither change direction, I know this is not the accepted theory and it may be wrong but it helps me understand the reactions of a coil.

When we pulse a coil in just and ordinary transformer we'r hitting the coil 180 degree's out of phase(each side of the coil winding) with 120 cycles but the voltage on the scope shows 60 cycles with a 90 degree phase shift and the current also has a 90 degree phase shift at 60 cycles, a coil separates voltage and amperage or pos and neg however you want to look at it.

These are just observations and probably arent correct but I will entertain this view and the classical view, I believe it pays to be open minded in my search.

I know I'll get trashed over this post but Im just stating what some are thinking and you see Im just an old country boy my tenure was up along time ago  lol

Im not afraid to be wrong I have nothing to prove
Some of us are smart and some just have common sense
Lets keep up the search

Evil prevails when good men do nothing.

What really gets me, is I was the one to told to 'stop spouting nonsense' when I first attempted to correct this...
might as well be 'don't confuse the situation with facts'
If you keep insisting on the current reversing on a coil, I don't know how you can make any forward progress, since real observations will never align with your imagined framework

[verpies]

The restated question is this: Is the COP of a transformer always the same regardless whether the source and the load are connected at the same time (to the primary and secondary coil) or is the COP lower or higher when the load is not connected at the same time the source is connected (by means of toggle transistors)?

IMO opinion the true transformer mode is more efficient than the discontinuous flyback "transformer" mode of energy transfer, because in the discontinuous flyback mode, the current spends more time circulating in resistive windings, incurring more tRI² energy losses.

On the other hand, the current in the primary winding is lower in the discontinuous flyback mode (rises more slowly due to lack of reflected secondary impedance).
It would be interesting to read what TinselKoala thinks about the efficiency comparison of these two modes of energy transfer.

When a magnet moves through a non-connected coil then this magnet generates a voltage difference between both endings of the coil's wire.

Yes, but getting the magnet to move requires work.
Also, voltage alone does not constitute power not energy.

If the voltage developed across this coil is offered a conductive path and allowed to cause current flow, then the magnet will be braked