Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

I studied Ken Wheeler years ago along with a thousand other similar theories on how the universe works.....

Since Tesla stated »I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device.«, perhaps we should look at one more theory how the universe works: The Electric Universe - The 5th state of matter

»Filaments and jets in the fourth state of matter contradict physics many hundred times but they clearly obey all laws of physics in the fifth state of matter. Spark, lightning, ion beam, mercury-filament (in mercury-lamps) and electron beam in TV have a characteristic cylinder-form with exact circular cross section, a well defined matter and a measurable particle-energy, however nobody asks in which state of matter they are?«

»The electrons are attracted onto the positive surface (and remain there) and the ions are repulsed in the jets (Fig.8-9) along light-years, accelerating to the highest velocities in the Universe. These ions are the cosmic ray particles! This electric model explains that the heavy ions and not the light electrons are the cosmic ray particles.«

So then, we have to catch ions not electrons? But maybe we can use electrons to catch those ions?

Possibly we should rather dig deeper into the 5^th state of matter instead of the 4^th dimension.

[verpies]

3.  Verpies:   It was good. hee.
http://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg477907/#msg477907
you described the say a......... sunrise  for me ............... In here I would  describe it in similar  way. heeee 
What good is that we are at the same point and can communicate with words without asking too many questions.,
Euclid's is............ geometry my friend I was digging in it  for some time  in  last decade.
https://youtu.be/QHBEHOOsxT4?t=461

I think it facilitates communication.
Did you ever arrive at a conclusion that the Euclidean geometry is just the most restricted subset of Projective Geometry and that as more and more restrictions are placed on Projective Geometry then other geometries emerge: first the Affine Geometry then the Metric Geometry and finally the Euclidean Geometry where the scale is fixed at 1.
See  http://www.cs.unc.edu/~marc/tutorial/node32.html

Q3.
How  do you  understand response of Meta in regards to the questions asked?
http://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg477911/#msg477911

It was not direct. Vital information was missing such as frequency and modulation.  The carrier was misdefined.  The 3D voltage was referred to transformer windings of unknown orientation instead of the 3D electric potential as the term has implied.  There was no mention of the current in these transformer windings and hence the magnetic field in the core cannot be deduced...even if the core was defined.
The dimensions were not defined - only enumerated.

4. In regards to   Meta experiment

Re: MetaQEG.pdf  - witki mi opadly.
The picosecond DPDT switch is made out of "Unobtanium".  (below 10ns, too).  It is obvious that this device has never been experimented upon.

[stivep]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izzujmKROWI


Wesley

[NickZ]

  Zeit:  you mentioned:
  "Isn't this a strange thing: Someone with 2800+ posts regarding the search for free energy tells me not to waste my time by searching any longer for free energy? What do we make of this?

Since we all have no clue then how can it be that Ruslan got that clue somehow? Or could it be that Ruslan has also no clue thus all those Ruslan devices are fake? But then, why do you waste your time in the Dally/Ruslan thread?
                                                                                                                                               end quote.

   Some years ago I asked why has not a single person on this thread replicated or even tried to replicate at least their version of the TK device(s). And Verpies answered,  that there is not enough information just from looking at the video, to know just how it's built, to be able to replicate it properly.   I took his advice and moved to the Daly thread, instead. There I've been ever since.  Because of Ruslan and his videos, and diagrams, and explanations, along with Akula's ideas. Which there is some information on. And up to now we have not found even a single diode out of place, that could lead to calling any of those devices fakes. At least on the Ruslan videos, and schematics. 

  On the other hand there's No schematics, no diagrams, nor any idea what's inside the black box, or how the driver circuit really works,  on the TK device, such as he's showing on his last video, or on any other one he's made or shown previously.

  I'm not suggesting that you give up the search for free energy. I'm just suggesting that one should build what there is some info on, and not try to build what there's little to no information on.  Of course it's up to you.

[Meta]

Re: MetaQEG.pdf  - witki mi opadly.
The picosecond DPDT switch is made out of "Unobtanium".  (below 10ns, too).  It is obvious that this device has never been experimented upon.

______________________________________________________________

Nanoseconds, not picosecnds.

Fast switches

http://blackle.com/results/?cx=partner-pub-8993703457585266%3A4862972284&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=fast+switch+5-30+nanoseconds&sa=+#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=fast%20switch%205-30%20nanoseconds&gsc.page=1