Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 124 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Excellent post Wotsup.

Maybe human conciousness masks other realities or maybe the reality of our universe is created by human conciousness.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: batfish on March 26, 2016, 09:01:42 AM
There seem to be two ways of varying the parameters of an LC system - by varying the capacitance and by varying the inductance. On the face of it the techniques used in magnetic amplifiers to vary inductance look more promising. As for a Lenz-free output transformer ...

The quick drawing below could make that stuff a bit more clearer.

Question: What would be the feedback on the right hand LC circuit due to the frequency doubler circuit supplying the left hand coil with current? Could there be a parametric frequency variation in that LC circuit? How would this affect the right hand side generator?

At least it would be a closed loop that could create some unforeseen effects. :)

And since the high voltage coil is open, it would be Lenz-free anyway.

batfish

Zeitmaschine, in your diagram, is the feedback varying the parameters of the oscillator (which would perhaps lead to exponentially increasing amplitude), or is it directly driving it?

Batfish

wattsup

Quote from: wattsup on March 15, 2016, 10:22:09 AM
@all
So here is the question. hahahaha Always a question hey.

Is it possible to take one AC line and pass it through a type of full bridge rectifier where you can then output TWO DISTINCT outputs that are 180 degrees out of phase? If this is possible, then you can make transformers with two primaries, one left primary, center secondary, one right primary where each primary now gets its own AC peak pulsed that is 180 degrees out of phase and the secondary will now have the impulses coming from two changing vectors. If this can work and increase the intensity of the Sway of copper nuclei, we just made a new toy for working towards OU devices.

wattsup

@Zeitmaschine

The TK device (if it is real) can have one of two workings.

1) Flyback Coil (1) primary produces HV to Tesla Coil (2) type primary where its HV is compressed to higher amps and returned to #1 primary in a loop.

2) AC mains is used to created two outputs at 180 degrees offset.

So as I had posted above more then a week ago, here is a challenge. Take two standard identical transformers having 1 primary and 1 secondary each. Put identical light bulbs on each secondary.
Using the 120 or 220 vac mains (I use a variac), use as many properly rated diodes as you want to produce the final outcome of the bulbs lighting up in alternation. This means when one light bulb lights the other is off and alternate like that. If this can be done first, then OU is not that far away.

While anyone with the proper abilities tries to accomplish this, it would be a good idea to write down all the connection methods used, all the scope shots shown per connection method and try to understand all the changes taking place with each change in connection method. Just this small exercise if done in a methodical manner will make your mind go crazy when you start to try and understand what is happening inside those two transformers. I will not do it for you or anyone. It requires someone with good EE street cred.

The basis is very simple. If AC is alternating as our books explain, and if the full bridge rectifier takes up and down waves of a normal sinewave and produces double the up waves and no down waves, then it should be possible to split the output with one line having only up waves at every start of a cycles and the other line should be able to have only down waves at the second half of each cycle producing two 30Hz (if 60Hz) or 25HZ (if 50Hz) bulbs to light in alternation. Sounds simple enough and if the books are right then this should be very easy to do. Good luck. Just be careful if you are using your scope. Do not use the ground lead.

wattsup


Zeitmaschine

Quote from: batfish on March 26, 2016, 11:33:55 AM
Zeitmaschine, in your diagram, is the feedback varying the parameters of the oscillator (which would perhaps lead to exponentially increasing amplitude), or is it directly driving it?

I don't know. That was my question. But since there is something we don't know yet, the chances are good that we can learn something new here.

Quote from: wattsup on March 26, 2016, 11:47:44 AM
This means when one light bulb lights the other is off and alternate like that. If this can be done first, then OU is not that far away.

I can't parse that theory. What is it that collects here the energy and from where, that is needed to get OU?

Quote from: NickZ on March 25, 2016, 09:04:24 PM
I don't know what you mean by an external feed-back loop,  as there is no internal feed back loop.