Earth Electrical Energy Datalogging Experiments

[freepow]

Hi Bill, could you give me detailed instructions on how to build your stubblefield battery,please 

[jeanna]

Hi Bill, could you give me detailed instructions on how to build your stubblefield battery,please 

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3500.msg74742#msg74742

Best instructions come from the inventor himself.

Make yours look as much like the drawings as possible and use what you can to make the materials match.

jeanna

[IotaYodi]

Best instructions come from the inventor himself.

@Jenna. Sometimes anyway. I have a problem visually with the drawings on the patent that was posted. I think someone should redo it. As he said bare iron wire wasn't absolutely necessary but the effect was a little better.  The cloth covered wire will work. I think that one of the main things is that each layer is covered in cloth for the electrolytic effect of water. If just the iron wire itself was covered you lose some of  the electrolytic effect to my understanding but I may be wrong on this. The sizing of the iron wire from what I see should be the same size or slightly larger than the copper wire,as thats the wire creating the magnetic field.
Tishatang mentioned conditioning which I misunderstood as earth elements and not field conditioning. The make and break is still vague to me.
I have a question on why the 30 foot spacing with the rods? I also have a question on frequency length. I have some info on 60hz Em waves that could possibly affect your joule thief experiments. Also need help in analyzing some things I ran across while working at my bench. Ill post all this later as I need to go to bed as I have to drive my wife to the dentist 45 miles away in the morning.
Frank

[jeanna]

@Jeanna. Sometimes anyway. I have a problem visually with the drawings on the patent that was posted. I think someone should redo it.
...

OK
electricme made a version, and did a good job. It was one of his first posts so you could find it in his profile at the beginning of his posts. (He did add his own supposition that the patent said what kind of cloth, which it did NOT.)

The only real information we have is from the patent and the brochure.
The rest is speculation.

I think it is really important to give a new person the true information and not add all the suppositions from others including ourselves.
The best way to be really confused by this is to add other's suppositions to the original, because they may be wrong or may steer you in a wrong direction.

I printed out a copy of the patent and literally read it every day. I read it and discovered a new meaning or phrase each time I did this.
There is no easy way... but this is not hard.

Tishatang mentioned conditioning which I misunderstood as earth elements and not field conditioning.

I think this is from the brochure, but it may also be suppositions.

The make and break is still vague to me.

Me too. I have my own idea and many people continue to add theirs... again suppositions.

I have a question on why the 30 foot spacing with the rods? I also have a question on frequency length.

He never said to do that 30 foot spacing, but I noticed that.
My own supposition.
I think I am the only person to have made a measurement on a scope using an earth probe either in the simple probes or with stubblefield. People took their scopes outside but I do not believe anyone else came up with a frequency.
I kept requesting them to do that, but I missed it if anyone did.

I have some info on 60hz Em waves that could possibly affect your joule thief experiments.

Yes, please. Also, please remember I am new to a lot of this so please make it simple!

Also need help in analyzing some things I ran across while working at my bench.

ooo now I am really curious.

jeanna

[electricme]

@ IotaYodi

OK
electricme made a version, and did a good job. It was one of his first posts so you could find it in his profile at the beginning of his posts. (He did add his own supposition that the patent said what kind of cloth, which it did NOT.)

That's right, I find the patients very difficult to read and understand as they are written in a way which confuses me.

The only real information we have is from the patent and the brochure.
The rest is speculation.

I think it is really important to give a new person the true information and not add all the suppositions from others including ourselves.
The best way to be really confused by this is to add other's suppositions to the original, because they may be wrong or may steer you in a wrong direction.
Right on jeanna

I printed out a copy of the patent and literally read it every day. I read it and discovered a new meaning or phrase each time I did this.
There is no easy way... but this is not hard.
I think this is from the brochure, but it may also be suppositions.

Me too. I have my own idea and many people continue to add theirs... again suppositions.

I think I am the only person to have made a measurement on a scope using an earth probe either in the simple probes or with stubblefield. People took their scopes outside but I do not believe anyone else came up with a frequency.
I kept requesting them to do that, but I missed it if anyone did.


jeanna, there are many frequencies detectable on the scope, we need more sophisticated equipment to analyse them.
 
Yes, please. Also, please remember I am new to a lot of this so please make it simple! ooo now I am really curious.

jeanna

jim