Can someone confirm this in FEMM?

[broli]

@Broli, before you abandon this thread, please look at the experiment I referenced and comment on it.

0c that would indeed show that moving by the magnet in one direction would give it more energy than the other. But the obvious question is did he put it flat and did it end up perpetuating? The video is from April so I assume he abandoned it?

[0c]

0c that would indeed show that moving by the magnet in one direction would give it more energy than the other. But the obvious question is did he put it flat and did it end up perpetuating? The video is from April so I assume he abandoned it?

Is it perpetuating? No. He has problems when he attempts to take it beyond 180 degrees, and hasn't yet figured out how to make the process repeatable without incurring losses. What he demonstrated has been replicated, and apparently his son was able to suggest some changes that improve the gain (and increase the loss in the opposite direction).

Abandoned? Uh Uh! In fact he has just started discussing it over on CLaNZeR's forum. Maybe you should log in over there and join the discussion. He's looking for more ideas and replications.

[broli]

Is it perpetuating? No. He has problems when he attempts to take it beyond 180 degrees, and hasn't yet figured out how to make the process repeatable without incurring losses. What he demonstrated has been replicated, and apparently his son was able to suggest some changes that improve the gain (and increase the loss in the opposite direction).

Abandoned? Uh Uh! In fact he has just started discussing it over on CLaNZeR's forum. Maybe you should log in over there and join the discussion. He's looking for more ideas and replications.

I will check it out, but I don't want to get sidetracked again. This very topic is a side track from http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4272-manipulating-magnetic-flux.html .

I am grateful for it. Because now I can go back and assist that thread with the new knowledge I have acquired.

[robbie47]

My last request would be asking robbie to integrate his first graph. From some negative or positive point to 0 and share the result.

I enlarged the range of movement so a bit more accuracy was obtained.
Top graph is the force on the moving magnet in x-direction
Bottom graph is the integral of the top one.
Mind the slight negative endresult.......(the last, utmost right  value in the integral graph)

[mscoffman]

In the post link below I propose a pendulum type device
as a test of magnetic overunity, based on the work of
several other folks.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7341.msg192005#msg192005

Unlike the pendulum in your current link, my pendulum
alters its stator field to avoid the sticky spot, opening the
use of potentially very strong magnetic drive arrays. The key
seems to be the use of a rapidly moving "escapement
mechanism". Yes, magnetic interactions are 100% conservative
but like the LR and RC time constants of electronics; only
if you let the process settle fully. The escapement seems to
alter the magnetic field fast and start a new cycle before the process
can equalise to 100% conservative, essentially cutting the
conservation process "off at the knees". See, elecromagnetic
forces are 10^18 times stronger than gravitational ones but
that is not "infinetly strong"; that it would take to instantly
guarentee 100% conservativenes, so the process will take
a certain amount of time.

Either there will be excess energy available or a macroscopic
quantum energy mask will descend over the unit like what happens
at the nanoscopic level.

:S:MarkSCoffman