Big fall,smooth jump...

[iacob alex]

.....is the next open suggestion,for the only one problem of a possible PM.

     You can find it at ;   www.evert.de/eft730e.htm

     Prof. Evert made the first step: a new kind of the switching procedure (short arm into long arm and back).

     To sensitize,amplify this interesting proposal,we need some more steps....the next is yours.

         All the Best! / Alex

[iacob alex]

  .....is related to a new kind of switching procedure (short arm into a long one,and back).

       Smooth is free from difficulty,smooth jump is an easy sharp sudden motion.

       It seems to me ,that the one and the  only problem of a possible PM is this switching motion,if we can make it "self".

       The details (shape,number of arms/spokes and others...),turn out of minor importance:it's a "pesonal" construction or inspiration.

       If you have in sight the "history" (evolution) of this elementary motion/mechanical switching,you can understand easy ,that this is the main point of PM.

       Not using the long experience of PM.can result that we can fall down easy in some real traps of our imagination :the illusory ,usually is science fiction.

       Prof. Evert (  www.evert.de  ) can be an excellent trainer for people interested  to develop their own opinion about this old "knotty point " of inventics:the "dream " of  PM .

           All the Best! / Alex

[iacob alex]

 
....you can understand more explicitly,if you take a short look at a movie:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCH8kNCZsU0&feature=related

The real world is our teacher,and to "copy" it is necessary.

If you insist on "yourself"...try to replace the acrobats with a mechanical "something",so to get "self-motion" due to gravity fall/flow and inertia/temporary storage.

      All the best! / Alex

[johnny874]

.....is the next open suggestion,for the only one problem of a possible PM.

     You can find it at ;   www.evert.de/eft730e.htm

     Prof. Evert made the first step: a new kind of the switching procedure (short arm into long arm and back).

     To sensitize,amplify this interesting proposal,we need some more steps....the next is yours.

         All the Best! / Alex

      Alex,
  His thoughts are interesting. I posted something very similar a long time ago(years). That is why I have moved on. By the way, the 4 weighted wheel is essentially based on that principle which is really similar to Bessler's Mt 24.
Weights on levers and nothing else will probably never work. Short or long arm would make no difference.
Energy does need to be converted if it's potential can be realized in any aspect as free energy.

                                                                                                                       Jim
                                       
 

[iacob alex]

 
       Hi Johnny!

Evert posted his non-working proposal("Pendulum Wheel") ten years ago.

You can find on youtube ,a multitude of Circus performances with the tag "Wheel of Death".

The most interesting,engaging the attention about simplicity is that with a single artist:fulcrum,lever and only one moving mass (playing alternatingly short arm-long arm).

That's all:playing gravity and inertia !

If you replace the artist (moving mass) with "something " moving alike...you have the "toy".

     All the Best! / Alex