Back to Basics

[wattsup]

Here is a question for back to basics. I now know the FTPU has at least 6 small capacitors and one resistor.

Delay in the case of the TPUs would offer a successive pulsing in two or more coils, rings, control coils, or what ever.

So let's say I had a positive pulse line to which I connect four small capacitors (all with slightly different values) all in parallel but the other end of each capacitor goes to an individual coil or whatever. Then the other end of the coils or whatever goes to one primary side of a transformer to have a good place to land the pulses and measure off the secondary. The other end of the primary goes to negative.

So the question is if I pulse this, will each coil get 1/4th of the pulse energy at a different time, even though the capacitors are pulsed all at the same time? This woul dbe good since being in parallel will never overload the capacitor and this will also provide a place to increase in gain as pulse energy increases, it will always be divided by four.

Can anyone give me a straight answer?

[sparks]

    Sorry wattsup but along those lines.  If you've been following Grumpy's line of  thought we need to get some kinda dielectric stress going in the tpu.  The Hendershot torroidal core is placed between two plastic plates.  Then the plates are pulsed with what I would imagine are high voltage dc spikes/kicks.  (The Hendershot device does not work if filtering capacitors are used in the dc input.)  This does two things it stresses the vacuum and creates a displacement magnetic field.  I believe the timing device is  mod: used to shorten the duty cycle of the input waveform and to phase the kick.    Say the ambient magnetic field flux is influenced by an external modulator of some sort.  Iron's atoms respond more to the magnetic dipole moments alignment with a magnetic field change than it's electric dipole moments do to an electrical field change.  Therefore the resistance to current of an iron conductor is more influenced by an external magnetic field  shift than an imposed voltage.   If there are any vacuum fluctuations or changes in the dielectric k value within the field of the big round capacitor plates it will appear in the displacement magnetic field where we find the collectors/induction coils.  This process would magnify any vacuum produced electrical flux changes.  On top of the displacement magnetic field generated by the input kick charging the plates would be the vacuum generated flux variants. 
   I guess the next logical step would be to produce a kick on like two records or some static stuff like wire spool plastic and measure the magnetic flux produced by the kick with a sampling variable inductor capacitor network.  The vacuum flux would appear as hash on top of the input displacement .  SM could have been inputting 5kz and making the thing ring for maximum efficiency but his gain is the hash riding the 5kz. If the kick breaks down into alot of different freqs it is a matter of which freq to become resonant with.  We don't want to go too high or the kick just goes radiant and is wasted.  A number of pickup tanks could be used ringing at different freqs all with the vacuum flux gain riding them.  The power in the circuit would be increased by the amplitude of the currents in the periphial tanks circuits.

[Grumpy]

Here is a question for back to basics. I now know the FTPU has at least 6 small capacitors and one resistor.

Delay in the case of the TPUs would offer a successive pulsing in two or more coils, rings, control coils, or what ever.

So let's say I had a positive pulse line to which I connect four small capacitors (all with slightly different values) all in parallel but the other end of each capacitor goes to an individual coil or whatever. Then the other end of the coils or whatever goes to one primary side of a transformer to have a good place to land the pulses and measure off the secondary. The other end of the primary goes to negative.

So the question is if I pulse this, will each coil get 1/4th of the pulse energy at a different time, even though the capacitors are pulsed all at the same time? This woul dbe good since being in parallel will never overload the capacitor and this will also provide a place to increase in gain as pulse energy increases, it will always be divided by four.

Can anyone give me a straight answer?

For true sequential activation of coils, I recommend some sort of triggering arrangement that will allow adjustment between each coil in the sequence and not allow the first to turn on again before it's turn. 

Just knowing that something uses six capacitors doesn't tell you very much without a very good theory of operation or a schematic.  You can have six caps in a delay line or a Marx generator or a voltage multiplier or a filter or a thousand other circuits.

[wattsup]

Well OK I know you can use caps for many uses but the question was pretty specific to this case and well outlined. I was not asking what the caps can be used for.

Anyways, tonight, hopefully I will post a nice picture of the FTPU with some great
discoveries that will give a better idea on the winding and control. I now know the front end to the right of the toroid is the top ring/coil control and the bottom ring/coil control is situated behind the toroid where there is the same capacitor as the EM capacitor. The back end also has the feed power coming in via a resistor. lol

You can also see the bottom ring wire going up from the center of the spool, coming out between the two magnet placement terminals flush with the toroid then it hugs the toroid to the right going to the back end. lol

The basic premise is mutual induction to achieve mutual gain. The toroid has two coils and there are two half wound control coils on each outer ring. Half top goes with  half bottom control coil going to positive of the toroid half and the top ring goes to negative of the same toroid half. Same thing for the other toroid half but in reverse. All you have to do is pulse the top two control coils and all the energy will circulate through the complete circuit (top and bottom control coil halves, toroid half, top ring) + (other top and bottom control coil halves, other toroid coil and bottom ring) and back making two loops with the core of the toroid being used as an accumulator point. The more the toroid core accumulates, the more it has to send around again increasing with gain. The latent state of the pulsing will create mini-field collapses that will return from both ends of the rings and add to the energy being circulated to the point that an output can be taken from circulating polarities. Kind of like having an automatic apple peeler scrapping off the skin as the apple turns. The pulsing not only gives the pulse but more importantly, system directionality or proper biasing.

All you need is one pulse frequency per TPU, but in the case of the LTPU, the design is two TPUs in one so you do need two pulse frequencies.

I have not found a diode yet. But, the FTPU will give up most of its build secrets soon enough.

Just read Bruce_TPU's last post as he is also on a similiar track. But you cannot post on his thread because it is locked. Smart guy.

[darkspeed]

I have not had time to read all the post yet so i just wanted to ask...

Bruce_TPU is getting his info from who?

Bruce_TPU's info is credible?

Bruce_TPU has built one that works?

Thanks