Back to Basics

[Grumpy]

Are you nulling a field with the 180deg? What am i missing? i need more coffee....

180 degrees

I changed my answers to Chef 180 degrees and no one said a word.   Just a curious observation.

Dollard did the 180 degree field for dielectric flux experiements which he never published as far as I know.  He said that this contains all of the energy - basically to Tesla MT's connected at the primary and wound in a mirrored fashion.

Anyway, I used transistor rather than mosfets  for a few reasons: can trigger with freq synth, cheaper, non-linear - but mosfets would work too.

[Grumpy]

Actually you can scope the event, but what you need is my Litz tank, modified with the edition of a number of other litz tanks in Russian nesting doll fashion with a small air gap, so as the field expands you can get the differential between tanks. The shockwave is slowed down every time its path changes density copper wires > air > copper wires > air.... Shock waves love segmented objects

Ev Grey

Density you say.  That would change the parameters.  So, a change in density is all you need.

[darkspeed]

Because of this thread, somewhere out there, the distant sound of a department, quietly getting a budget increase

[darkspeed]

180 degrees

I changed my answers to Chef 180 degrees and no one said a word.   Just a curious observation.

Dollard did the 180 degree field for dielectric flux experiements which he never published as far as I know.  He said that this contains all of the energy - basically to Tesla MT's connected at the primary and wound in a mirrored fashion.

Anyway, I used transistor rather than mosfets  for a few reasons: can trigger with freq synth, cheaper, non-linear - but mosfets would work too.

I thought when you said 180deg you were referring  to how you laid out your transistors on your board... i need sleep...

[sparks]

   Grumpy gave us a test and we all flunked.      There is no way we are going to get a rise fast enough to do what has to be done.  As any investment of energy into an inertial field is a case of diminishing returns.  A speeding train takes a long time to get up to speed but how fast can it hit a wall.  How fast do two colliding trains collide.  How fast do two photons cancel each other out.  Any investment into rise needs to effect a repolarization of the field in question faster than the speed of light.  Otherwise the energy is purely reactive and will be pissed away.  If we want to put a 3d effect to the spacetime plane and draw in some mass/energy we have 1 second to repolarize a field 300,000 meters by 300,000 meters in area.  c2  As you reduce the size of the field you have to get faster.  Like Tesla's hammer analogy.  You swing the hammer for a long time and bam let it hit the nail quicker than a photon can be formed. The conversion of the at rest energy of the entire mass in play  (hammer and target)  converts into force faster than spacetime can radiate the event or produce time.  Something has to give so the whole spacetime grid gets tugged on.  Being elastic in nature it will bounce back with the converted force and we get reactive energy.  But while it was depressed other forms of mass/energy rolled down the trampoline.  This rolling down the trampoline is gain from the vacuum state itself.  When the trampoline flattens you get the input energy flying back out PLUS the inertial gain of the rolling down mass/energy.  Like a kid on a trampoline who got sand around the edges before he got jumping.  The sand rolls down from the edges towards the depression the kid makes in the center of the trampoline.  Nature puts the sand at different points on the tramp all we have to do is catch it rolling down for a little gain on each cycle.  If we hit the tramp with knives on our shoes that will be a different deal.  The kid moves from one dimension into another never to be seen again.  Why the fuck would anyone with a heartbeat put sailors on a steel ship they were smacking with the largest emps they could muster at the time is beyond me.   Snakeminds suck.