New invention of motion less generation of electric power

[gravityblock]

@exnihiloest:

Call the article pseudoscience if you like.  Articles submitted for peer review are dismissed by the powers that be and are never published if it's not in there best interest.  Same thing with patents being rejected for "National Security and other similar reasons". 

Gravity is a monopole force that works in attraction mode only.  A magnet and metal piece is a monopole force that works in attraction mode only.  There's evidence all around us that point to monopole forces. 

The knowledge we have of the universe is very small.  There are a lot of inconsistencies with our currently accepted theories.  We only have theories on what gives matter it's mass, thus the LHC looking for the theoretical higgs boson which makes up the higgs field.  97% of the known universe appears to be missing, thus the dark energy/matter.

Currently accepted theories says what we're trying to do on this forum is not possible, even though it is very far from being complete and accurate without all the inconsistencies.  Maybe if they looked into the direction of the impossible instead of only looking into the directions of what they consider possible, then we may have more complete and accurate theories.  So, why do you look to them for all the answers.  This forum should be based on fringe science based on observations of others and thinking outside the box.

Actually there is no such thing as a "North or South Pole" according to wikipedia.  It says North and South Poles should only be used as a reference point for the different ends of the magnets.  You really have to read between the lines in what is published anywhere including academic books in universities..

A static charge has no magnetic field, but when it moves it does have a magnetic field.  I will assume the static charge has a magnetic charge and has nothing to reach out to and the monopole field stays inside the charge.  When the electric charge moves, the monopole charge lags behind by 90 degrees.  This causes the monopole field to reach out to the other side forming a dipole field.  This is the reason for the magnetic charges carrying the magnetic fields.

A possible reason for electrons inducing their own magnetic fields is due to them having a magnetic charge or a monopole field contained within them.  Physicist has yet to figure out how electrons induce their own magnetic fields, so we are left to assume.  We haven't been able to do this by using a dipole field, so a monopole field is a good candidate.   This is my best assumption based on linking observations together.  It is better to assume and try to prove those assumptions correct with experiments, than to make no assumptions and do nothing.

Go take your currently accepted incomplete inconsistent non-pseudoscience somewhere else.  It will do us nothing here "as is".  It should be used as a guide only in addition to fringe science and theories in order to piece the entire puzzle together.

[forest]

GravityBlock:

i will invite senior selected members of this forum after completion of my current work

but here is some more brain waves might help understanding combination of electrical charges and  magnetic fields

for wave propagation in passive zone we need at least quarter of the size of wave length

if you make a transformer equal to the  quarter of the wave length of frequency you will get passive power in active zone  that is 1 to many format without power lose there are many mechanical analogies for this...

Give us those analogies please. I still cannot grasp the idea behind 1/4 wavelength   

[gravityblock]

deleted, sorry

[jan.kolar]

for wave propagation in passive zone we need at least quarter of the size of wave length

if you make a transformer equal to the  quarter of the wave length of frequency you will get passive power in active zone  that is 1 to many format without power lose there are many mechanical analogies for this...

A few years ago i calculated conditions in simple circuit with transformer and RC elements on primary and secondary side. At first I have used classical differential equations, nothing strange happened. For the second time I have used differential equations with time delay between primary and secondary. These types of equations are quite difficult to solve so numerical methods are used extensively. Result was that secondary current rised to infinity. I checked all my calculations and found no error. But trying to decreasing time delay lower and lower current waveform was always different than classical solution (not accounting any time delay). So i dont know what would happen in reality when delay between primary and secondary is increased...

Another though occured to me in this context. Hungary man named Janos Vajda suggested way how to get energy from wave fields. The key is that energy density in any point of field is proportional to square of intensity. So after interference of two waves there can be energy gain or even energy loss (it all depends on frequencies of waves and phase differences). Dont know if this principle was practically used in some type of device. More info here : http://www.zpelabs.com/zpelabs/hungarian/studyexp.htm

[jan.kolar]

In fact if you go to atomic level and even lower you find that every electron has its own magnetic field due to inherent spin. For quantum physicits spin is only mathematical abstraction but i believe that electron is very fast rotating particle. This would explain its own magnetic field with classical conception (at least qualitatively). My conception is that space is filled with omnipresent aether and elementary particles are some types of vortices of this hypothetical fluid which is similar in properties to ideal fluid (zero viscosity). Strange that superfluid helium (which is fluid with zero viscosity!) express its quantum properties also on macroscopic scale when set to rotation. Maybe physicists should more concentrate on ultra-low energies instead of building such extra challenging projects like LHC (not saying that this is useless).

A static charge has no magnetic field, but when it moves it does have a magnetic field.  I will assume the static charge has a magnetic charge and has nothing to reach out to and the monopole field stays inside the charge.  When the electric charge moves, the monopole charge lags behind by 90 degrees.  This causes the monopole field to reach out to the other side forming a dipole field.  This is the reason for the magnetic charges carrying the magnetic fields.

A possible reason for electrons inducing their own magnetic fields is due to them having a magnetic charge or a monopole field contained within them.  Physicist has yet to figure out how electrons induce their own magnetic fields, so we are left to assume.  We haven't been able to do this by using a dipole field, so a monopole field is a good candidate.   This is my best assumption based on linking observations together.  It is better to assume and try to prove those assumptions correct with experiments, than to make no assumptions and do nothing.