Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New invention of motion less generation of electric power

Started by powercat, August 26, 2009, 08:52:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.


winsonali

forest:
yes concept is close enough but we are using proper wave length in passive mode. 

winsonali

Forest:

i have a factory where we are producing inverters the inverters that i have designed my self has extended time for battery life if a normal 200amp lead acid drop voltage from 13.8 to 8.8 in 4 hours my designed inverter give you six hours
why and how ?
i am using the factor of lose in transformer as valuable source means hysteresis curve causes loses we are using that as a benefit and switch the Mosfet's with a difference of time that recovers residual magnetic field.current loses are less and time automatically extended
like wise in this system i am completing wave length and here the component of hysteresis is not present if we think the same as mechanical analogy means this system has no reversing magnetic field in a motor so you get only forward drive.
some results i am sharing here for the purpose of analysis

In my inverter of 1 Kwatt if there is no load it draw 0.35amps at 12 volts where as the output is always stay at 220volts , other inverters consume 2.0 amps when there is no load

when we increase load, the secondary coil induce its own EMF in the core, to maintain the balance of power , the primary core starts consuming current Now if we develop some how a system where the change in secondary coil cannot effect the primary coil we will get a lose less system. this is only possible if we capture the EMF in its passive mode in a glass vacuum tube with maximum efficiency. this is my theory i have to proof it with practical

Mechanical analogy
in all motors you have reversing force called lenz force if some how you reduce or eliminate this reversing force means you got more efficient motor.
Bedini's and Joseph Newman's motors are working designs but they cannot sustain load both of them are working on BEMF
this is the problem of understanding BEMF is not energy create is the reversal of unused energy in coil. so they smartly used this energy to charge the other battery but there source energy is consumed, to get the work done they need to put more energy.

you can say the same applied to your system as well

no, i have extra energy
Why? and where?

when the energy cross the boundary of the active zone to passive zone all energy in the same frequency zone present in the air join the game just like in a LC tunning circuit and give you extra power in multiples of 1 to many format.

i wish this system should complete on as soon as possible and this knowledge may lead to many others to produce this energy device.  i am putting all this on the forum  by purpose (if something happens with me) so technology should not stop and continued by all means many other brains are working they can also get the idea may be they can put there input. and even they remember me in there prayers its enough for me.

the same pattern was in the mind of Tesla but he was looking for ionospheric energy.

   

forest

I see one problem. To go to passive zone you have to match length with 1/4 of wavelength which means oscillations should be in Mhz for possible wire length , right ? That's why we have no lenz-free motors because nobody had it done with many km of wire length.
Now bear with me, I'm not EE - in Mhz range you have EM radiation all over the place from circuit which is wasted energy. Is that correct ?
Tesla said that he never used high frequency, because he wanted conserved electrical energy in LC circuit without EM wasted, yet his output always contained coil of low induction which generated at least hundreds of khz.

I see no other explanation except a few possibilities:

1. There is possibility to use multiply of 1/4 wavelength and also a divisions which means secondary can be short
2. Tesla found another method to put something on secondary to go into passive zone without having  1/4 wavelength , something like antenna which small in size  yet electrically 1/4 wavelength was fulfilled.Is that possible ?
3. He was misleading us and really used high frequency at output to get to passive zone,yet in essential places in circuit he used low frequency (<30khz) to accumulate energy.

Seems that the energy put into passive zone by device is reflected back by ambient source at the same level of power. That's my comprehension of Tesla method though it may be completely wrong.

wattsup

@forest

I would say very high mhz but most probably in the ghz range.

@winsonali

I am still confused about this active and passive modes.

Can active and passive zones also be equated to Tesla's use of damped and undamped waves and his favor of damped waves that can become recycled, whereas undamped waves can only travel into total consumption zones or passive zones. 

Now in one of your three Genie videos you show that input is about 160 watts and output is about 440 watts over those three light bulbs. So why not just light one bulb and send the rest back to the source and loop it? It seems to me that you already have the answer. Or is the Genie limited to certain non-inductive loads that can react to the output frequency of the device thus dissipating the output energy and not letting any of that output stifle the drive circuit.

I am curious if in your patent you are actually stating any reference to overunity? If so, do you think the Patent office will accept this as such?