Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New invention of motion less generation of electric power

Started by powercat, August 26, 2009, 08:52:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

aaron5120

Quote from: winsonali on December 22, 2009, 02:13:09 AM
the KEY to understand

this is with my own experiments i called this effect "MDFGR" mutual dynamic field gate resistance if we control this effect we can simply convert the magnetic field in electric field.

what this effect is when magnetic lines passing through a current carrying conductor which is not magnetically permeable this effect force the material to to aligned atomic poles in the direction of external field flow as a result this changes the structure and gates of electronic arrangements and due to this reason the resistance of the material dynamically reduces and it starts consuming more and more current.


this phenomena is applicable to those materials which are good electrical conductor but poor magnetic conductor.
i have recently developed the formulation of an FE3o4 based alloy with some coating that wire will give you the same effect as core based coils but there will be no core required so we have reduced the greater mechanical force hindrance without lossing the efficiency

   
the circular disk magnets facing each other can produce more power then conventional generators. there is a key don't get the power until and unless it is at the peak and stop taking the power instantly once you fill the power bucket. as i have done in genie.

Very interesting and revealing insights, Winsonali.
I guess then, the external ring magnet (that enclose the shield and inner magnet) is a ceramic one with a silver coating? Because it is easier to make a ferrite disk with silver coating than to make a ferrite alloy wire  with silver coating, not to say silver or gold coated wires are very expensive in the audio industry!
Now I understand the switching time for the disk magnet coil generator setup, it should close the circuit at peak voltage and after filling up the capacitor, it shoud open circuit to avoid Lenz drag or whatever opposing force then arised.
The controller is a switching circuit for filling up capacitors.
Please Winsonali, can you elaborate more on the making of the outer disk magnet with respect to the inner magnet, and whether the coils need special wires for preventing the Lenz effect to arise?
many thanks for your explanations in advance!  ;)

winsonali

aaron

here is more information and why this setup is better then conventional methods also i have mentioned how to wind the coil in this way it will reduce magnetic resistance and give you smooth output

also i have mention the MOSFET on / off times for load collection




tinu

Quote from: winsonali on December 22, 2009, 03:24:24 AM
"Time will reveal what i have"

... the unit is now self running
...

Well, this is again one HUGE statement!
Such statements can not go by without reacting, even in a forum like this one.
Time will tell indeed but so far time rejected all statements of this kind…

So, here we are again. You know me by know; I usually either highlight the potential (universons, blazelabs etc) or try, in good fair, to correct the errors (often measurements errors â€"case with ‘the genie’) or I portray the whole picture in irony where there is no other hope (Tseung et all, Milkovik etc) or plainly slap into the face of ordinary liars (i.e. magnetic motor of Bedini etc) .

How should I react now, after reading that you have a self runner?!
(How should anyone reacting after hearing about such an accomplishment?!  ???)
Since you hesitate in posting the evidences (which I can fully understand why), I wait like everyone else for your future steps. So, I look forward open-minded and kindly ask you to try avoiding choosing a wrong road ahead. Even if you are onto something, there are good chances you screw everything up.
I kindly suggest you plan your proofs rigorously. At the current stage of OU (non-existent  ;)), making a proof that OU exists would make a great difference. If you’re willing to partially or fully disclose, that would be GREAT but even if you do not want to disclose a thing, a solid proof of OU would still help. Can you make it? Can you produce and deliver solid proofs that you have achieved OU even without disclosing the substance of your invention?
If you can do that, I offer to help if necessary, by testing the device and by publishing the results. I have no problems in signing also a NDA if you need one signed. I’ll buy the device for testing (actually I’d like to have 2 devices for testing) and I’ll bear all necessary expenses. I also fully accept you do not need me during testing (during the preparation of proofs) but irrefutable proofs following your statement still need to be produced in a reasonable timeframe. In case they do not show up, I regretfully will conclude you have nothing and it would then be reasonable for you to withdraw your claim/statement.

Comments, pls?
Do you consider the above fair?
If so, expectations and associated timeframes?

Best regards,
Tinu

winsonali

tinu

fully agreed with you some of the people have already seen the device and some very good members are due to come to see the demonstration very shortly

i have planned everything and have acquired the place for factory here in Northampton where we will be manufacturing them and i am doing all this at my own...

when you say error in measurement genie is now working through DC supply no more dimmer so the chances for error reduced greatly and due to DC input i am capable to feed the output back.

one or 2 devices are not at all problem once the unit is ready for sale any number you can get.

during this period what  ever knowledge i have i am discussing and learning more everyday and i think most of member of the forum are far more knowledgeable then me you can go through with my posts they are all weightless and without knowledge.
   
 

wattsup

Quote from: winsonali on December 22, 2009, 06:58:02 AM
tinu
when you say error in measurement genie is now working through DC supply no more dimmer so the chances for error reduced greatly and due to DC input i am capable to feed the output back.

Does the DC input now mean you have bypassed the AC input step downing and rectification?

Good move. That is the only way to simplify your device for future "Show and Tell". lol

I would like to ask you the same question I asked others about their device to give members here the idea on the level of complexity.

So, how many stages or steps does your device require to function as it does. This includes major steps and side steps. I mean it is surely not a 1 step power in/power out. My guess 7-8 minimum.