Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Bedini SSG - self sustaining

Started by plengo, August 28, 2009, 08:04:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

mscoffman

Quote from: plengo on November 01, 2009, 08:59:54 PM

I also had great difficulty adjusting the code to the PIC16F690 since it has different memory mapping and many different internal REGISTERS and so on, but now I got it up and running and it was worthy every penny and effort into this board. THANKS a lot to Groundloop for his help and his first board (and second, and third , I lost count) and his initial programming into the PIC16F84a.

Fausto.

@plengo

True, This is an unusual problem that effects primarily PIC style processors.

Quote from: plengo on November 01, 2009, 08:59:54 PM

In my first 1/2 hour running the battery goes up in voltage. Not much but definitely going up. I have been watching a few other threads and it is kind of clicking into my mind the similarity I see from them and this experiment of mine (check this thread out: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/4753-space-time-energy-absorption-pump-2.html).

Fausto.


@plengo

I see a lot of commonality between a lot of different purportedly free energy
devices. But You shouldn't make the assumption that they have actually proved
anything yet, though...So, "YOUR Experiments" can make a significant difference
in how people perceive things, that is what this business is actually all about...that
is creation of societal value! Not the new patents. Example; The Tesla Switch.

:S:MarkSCoffman

plengo

@mscoffman,

you're absolutely right. I am not making any assumptions about the veracity of my experiment. I have not convinced myself yet either. :)

Fausto.

guruji

Magluvin can you post the circuit please?
Thanks

Quote from: Magluvin on October 30, 2009, 01:29:00 PM
Im not saying that there are not additional or a depletion of electrons ever, but Im not sure that it plays a big part in a pulse motor setup. Lets say we have a pulse motor sitting on a table, not running, now get out the E690 Electron Counter and run a check. Just kidding. =]  But if we had an E690, and it gave us a number, then we run the pulse motor, even if it gathered some external electrons, once we shut it down and let it sit, The E690 may measure more, but did those extra electrons add up to any substantial power toward our goal? Or is it just a bit of static?
Now in very high voltage setups, It is still just moving electrons from one place to another, and thats only if they want to take the path that you give them. But it is all still just circuitry. Whether its capacitance or conductance.
Lets use the E690 to measure the electrons in a capacitor, then charge the cap, will the E690 actually measure a higher tot of electrons in the cap? I would say that if the cap were floating in a vacuum and it recieved a static charge, as a whole, then something somewhere is missing some, and eventually, that something is going to want them back. So that something will take from others that are willing to give up theirs, and so on.
How many electrons could we take from the earth, send them to the moon, before the earth says it wants them back?  Bam!! Or how many absent electrons on earth would it take take to start seeing problems here on earth because of it?  Crazy aint it?

I did a test on my setup due to a brain fart that had me convinced that maybe my second stage is just pulling from the battery through both reeds and the first diode.
I ran the big dog coil, .9 ohm on a reed and bat alone, and I got over 300v, but the drain on my 2.5v was .5v, where in the full setup, the tot drop was about .04v running both coils and driving the rotor nice.  So there is some advantage to the full setup.  Also I ran the setup without the first coil and using both reeds as they were, and the results were not the same. The first diode was warm and the first stage cap had an opposite effect on whether it was large or small. In the original setup, the larger the cap, the less the reed would stick, the test setup wanted small caps to keep the reed from sticking.
So there is something interesting going on as a full setup. I was a bit worried thinking about it for a couple hours. I was starting to smell my foot before it got to my mouth.
But I feel better now.  The first coil is applying some advantage to driving the heavy second stage as compared to directly driving it from a battery.

Havnt drawn up the circuit yet, I will today.

Magluvin

Magluvin

This is one circuit with a single diode on the second stage and one with a bridge on the second stage.
The first coil is the rotor driver and the reeds are timed off of the rotor.
It was done in MS paint so dont laugh at the art work. I had drawn the b/w one and zeropoint drew the top in question as to if they were the same.
Hope that helps.
I had just gotten some new reeds to do some new ideas. Ill post some vids soon.
Mags

plengo