Bedini SSG - self sustaining

[plengo]

Thanks Mk1 for the video, but what is the relevance of it with this thread?

Fausto.

[Lakes]

He spammed most of the threads with that...

[mscoffman]

http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/29990/Dr__Steven_Greer_The_Promise_of_New_Energy/

I don't much like these 'space aliens' trying to lay claim to overunity energy
tech. Our science is alive...Sorry about yours.

I don't know whether they are competitive or not, but if they want to help
the world develop new energy devices, they need to do it now...because
this train is getting ready to leave the station.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[mscoffman]

Fausto,

I am sorry but I am not going to get too involved in this thread.  If you do some critical searching on Bedini motors you will find the 'other' viewpoint.  Try searches like "bedini not working" or "bedini failure" or "bedini fraud."  I think there is even a Bedini motor thread on this web site where people talk about doing serious test runs and there is no over unity.

I suggest that you try to at least prove that you have something with a basic setup, before you get more complex.  Learn how to make the measurements and figure it out for yourself, and do it seriously.

You will find that there is nothing there, but you have to prove it to yourself.

MileHigh

I think if you read carefully what plengo has previously posted in this
thread he is a bit of an expert on these Bedini SGS machines, which is
what is required. Quite frankly there are a number of different technologies
besides Bedini all claiming overunity, and IMHO, they all contain certain
common underlying features with Bedini.

The problem is without firm knowledge, which is how most people
operate, it is very difficult to prove anything. A continuously
self running system even with an externally energy-funded control
system (not energy-funding the core) would pretty much seal the
fact that something unusual is happening. A control system can be designed
that uses arbitrarily low amounts of power, depending on how much effort one
wants to put in on it's design. It would be preferable to find out how much
the core circuit can supply, then design a final controller. Also Battery
swapping and monitoring is required in a number of different overunity
energy configurations which contains certain complexities.

Science knows pretty much, it also knows the boundary of what it knows,
so sometimes it requires someone who can push the envelope to make
advancements.

I'm hoping that plengo keeps the design open and at a high level so that
others can contribute to move it ahead. Once it is semiproven perhaps he
could clone *and test* his hardware so that others can duplicate his effort.
Excess complexity, too soon, is always the enemy, but I know from past
experience that people set up projects in that way...so I can only hope.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Groundloop]

Fausto,

The new 4 channel differential inputs data sampler with relay control
is well underway. I will get the pcbs in a week time. When I have tested
the new HW and SW then I will ship you a board (+ some hard to find parts).
This circuit is freeware.
I will post the SW later on when everything checks out OK.

Groundloop.