Has anyone heard how to replicate the John Kanzius salt water burn experiment?

[dankie]

There is nothing on his technique besides speculation .

From the looks of it , it is complex and expensive and requires much skill in the art .

You should forget about that thing seriously ... No patent to reverse-engineer , no nothing ...

[mscoffman]

Hi Mark.

did you invest in it? how many people or foundations do you know that funded the project?

the process made salt water burn not fuse. I have no evidence of any fusion reactions? where is your source? did it come from a peer reviewed document or literature stating that there were indications of a Fusion reaction taking place.

if there is a peer reviewed document stating any kind of fusion reaction taking place I sure missed it, I would like to study the document itself, if it exists. I love to study.

if you find any peer reviewed documentation of a fusion reaction with the John Kanzius salt water burn experiment then please post it here.

Jerry

If water from water vapor is not returned to the "mix" then the build
-up of chlorine and sodium would begin to become a problem. This suggests
confining the media and the flame inside a glass container where water
vapor would condense and drain back into the mix, would be work and be
interesting to watch. Sodium ions would probably be captured in the flame
imparting a yellow color to the flame.

---

As to CF Cold fusion. Cold Fusion is *speculated* to happen when mechanical
photons are deposited into a hydrogen bearing liquid. I think the energy
deposited by RF waves at higher levels would be sufficient to initiate
cavitation bubbles. There is no large scale "metal matrix" like a platinum
electrode to act as a target for TCB terminal cavitation bubbles though
in this liquid. But something else may function as the target material, in this
case for example, sodium or chloride ions.

It would be very easy to submerge two glass containers and heat then
with identical powered RF waves in a "water" bath and see if one raised it's
bath to a different temperature than the other one.

As I have indicated previously, changing the D deuterium levels in
the fluid is very easy for scientists to do and would indicate whether
any extra energy is coming from the CF reaction of D^2. Light hydrogen
only would not CF fuse while pure D2O should create maximum CF
excess heat.

John Kanzius would have been speculating about any excess
energy but its somewhat possible that there actually might be
some.  Normal people, not understanding CF, only see CF at natural
deuterium/hydrogen isotopic ratios of .000625 deuterium atom to every
hydrogen atom. Worse because the CF D^2 reaction has
only .000625*.000625 probability. (a metal matrix may conduct the
electrical and mechanical fields of the collapsing TCB's to a place that has
the D^2 configuration ready to fuse.)

The experimental question one *might* be left with is; Why would
a water fluid containing more vs less deuterium hydrogen isotope
emit heat energies at very different levels when excited by the same
input energy waves? This would be highly suggestive that CF is
actually occurring. A negative result wouldn't say so much, and again
pure light water should not support any CF excess energy at all.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Sergh]

A very important patent from a reputable source:
https://patents.google.com/patent/DE102011081915A1/en
There is an important point in it, the decomposition of water occurs in a thin water film.

Thin film ... many thin films .. many many very thin films ..

[kolbacict]

the thinnest films are in soap bubbles. And if you irradiate a bubble ..or foam ...
I'm really smart ...

[Sergh]

It is possible to create much thinner films. At the molecular level.