Steven Marks secret

[Yucca]

Yes, most all FETs have a very fast internal avalanche diode to prevent excess source-gate potentials developing and thus ruining the junction.

I thought for a long time that these internal diodes hindered OU research and actually set about trying to blow that diode without damaging the switch junction. I was unsuccesful in those efforts and ruined 4 FETs.

But what I have discovered since is one way to bypass that internal diode without slowing the switch down noticeably. Taking advantage of it being an avalanche device, simply use another avalalanche diode (source to drain) with lower passing voltage outside of the FET package, the leads much be kept short if you select a passing voltage only slightly lower than the internal diode. This diode can pump a collection cap or energize another coil allowing full harvesting of BEMF.

[Yucca]

@GK,

I agree we dont know what is obfuscation in SMs revelations. I have also thought about HV E fields interacting with mag fields. Perhaps his devices did contain a small buck converter like a CFL driver to mantain a strong Efield (with 5kHz ish ripples on it).

The video sparks do look like they are HF HV, like they have brief interoscillation instants when potentials are very high. This is reinforced by the fact that he has to strike the wires to make a spark (because the bulk of the power is low voltage) but he seems to be able to draw quite an arc once he has the plasma path established, longer than one would think for a few hundred volts. So the output voltage is probably on average 100s of volts but if viewed on a fast scope it might contain much higher transients. To use the OP properly fast big caps would be needed to absorb all the energy before running big slow loads like big coils etc. Light bulbs would work OK because they can sink quite high freqs being only tiny coils.

a Few nights ago I rigged my HV supply to create a 1...2kV potential across a top and bottom collector loops. The potential was slowly bleeding through resistors and neon so I could eyeball voltage. I was careful to have a safety spark gap on the HV OP set to much lower than the dielectric breakdown of my coil insulation which I'd already clocked at around 6kV, If that breaks down any equipment hooked up gets zapped! My gap breaks down at 2kV so I had a good safety margin also I was using x100 probes on the scope.

Then I fired control coils in different combos (cross coupled, bifilar shorted end, and parallel) at different freqs. I was thinking I could cause some avalanche (without arc) between collectors that might suck in something from ambient and perhaps I would see the neon brighten or dim without HV supply drawing different. I havent seen that yet, but i've only spent a couple of hours on this.

[wattsup]

Wow lots of good points to consider. Obfuscation is always in the back of our minds for sure. Either way we will find out eventually.

@GK

Let me tell you the idea behind what I am talking about regarding that test that is the one that blew my Pulse Generator. lol

In all our coils there is a north and a south polarity. If you wind enough turns, you will create these poles. Even your ring, if it has enough turns it will have both poles.

The idea behind using a coil of high inductance (CHI) connected to a ring of around 2 1/4 turns (number of turns in the FTPU rings) is that the ring will not have enough turns to create its own north and south poles. You take the positive of the power supply and connect it through the IRF840 to one side of the CHI and give it the positive pulse so the pulse leaving the CHI will be negative going to the ring. The ring does not have enough turns to become its own coil so it takes the negative from the coil and the other side of the ring is then also connected to the negative of the power supply. THE RING STARTS AND STOPS NEGATIVE so it only has one polarity. Now imagine you have a control coil wound all around that ring that is pulsing all negative. Basically what you created is a great imbalance in potentials. Also, the ring then has another special property. It does not have a blotch wall because the blotch wall is inside the CHI. If the ring had both polarities, it would also have to have a blotch wall, but this way, it does not. lol

Anyways, I am not EE savvy enough to give the right explanation but just imagine the ring has a north polarity, and you are located on the Earth hemisphere having a predominant south ambient polarity, since no one can be in both polarities at the same time on Earth, or even in space from interstellar fields, you will only be exposed to one polarity. So the control coil (CC) in this case is actually the collector or the juice maker. You pulse the ring negative while the ring is inside the CC, that pulse will move outwards through the CC and attract the south ambient field around you. Ether or whatever you want to call it can only be attracted through an imbalance, since ether is there to maintain a balance between all matter.

Now lets say there was only so much ether available physically around you. But ether is everywhere. It is in the space you were just in, are in and will be in in the next second since you are moving through it at 67kmph, every second of every day. And so is your TPU. lol

If you pulse a ring that has both polarities, the north will attract the south ambient field but the south will repel it so half your juice is used to attract and the other half is used to repel, hence neutral gain. I think this is why we are not winning this battle for free energy. We need to work with an imbalance in potentials and learn to capitalize on the ambient field around us.

A thunder cloud will strike the Earth but only 2/3rds of the way since the bolt actually also comes up out of the ground to meet it. The cloud made an imbalance and the Ether came to fill it up. I am not saying make so big but the imbalance principle is what we need to work out in this and then trust the Ether to meet it half way. Imagine if such a level of trust was a given fact, a normal fact of life, lay out the design and let the ether work with the imbalance. Clouds have been doing it since forever. 

For the CHI I used only half of a toroidal coil so the flux in the toroid core could turn in the core and return to the same coil thus increasing the imbalance on the ring. So imagine if you have two coils on the toroid as two CHIs and two rings with CC around them,. Sound familiar?????????

Now this could be totally off the mark in the way a TPU works, but it is an avenue I have been investigating recently by cutting lengths off rings and checking with a compass without pulsing but just applying a steady dc voltage to the CHI and ring. Guys really have to think out of the box and not rely on the conventional notions of EE. For me it is easy cause I don't have those conventional notions and my livelihood is not dependent on convincing others of this or that cannot be.

I think this is what was happening with @ottos ECD since it had CCs joined to rings and the rings did not have many turns. When his bulb lit super bright, that power was not coming from his power supply. It just appeared through thin air. How come?????????

Anyways, I have rambled long enough so I'll stop here.
Stay tuned for more FTPU discoveries.

Maybe one question. Is there a mosfet available that works in reverse of the IRF840. If the 840 will close when pulsed and open when the pulse is off. Is there a mosfet that opens when pulsed and closes when the pulse is off. If so, you can have one of each on the same line. The 840 pulses and the other diverts the flyback to the toroid, or, the CC.

[Grumpy]

If you did not insist on using so damn much current in the first place, then the  spike from the inductive collapse wouldn't be a problem.

Unless you are slamming magnetic fields together N to N or S to S - you don't need much current.

EDIT:

Of course, if you used a coil with very high inductance and the flyback effect to "excite" coils, then you might be on to something.

[Mannix]

 @wattsup up Excellent food for thought there , thank you for sharing


An electron tube is normally on and needs to be held off by a bias resisitor from cathode to grid so that it can then  be "allowed" to turn on by releasing the grid from its influence from the cathode , exactly the opposite of a fet ...Perhaps the point of difference that is important and, perhaps the context where the speed is signigicant .


Tubes also suffer from "magnetic inteference" and perhaps is what can be used to advantage.