Pauls Device; a damn shame he regrets revealing it.

[lancaIV]

After more than 500 years :

Gallilei /science
versus
Pope/In-quis-ation

Diskussion
or Disput

S
  d L

[Smith001]

Very entertaining discussion guys!  I have three simple observations:

1.  Bank accounts and how money is deposited, withdrawn or how interest is earned has nothing to do with energy.

2.  Omnibus' quote (and belief) that "First, you should convince yourself that the SMOT produces periodically excess energy"  is the basis for so many trivial claims to free energy we see today.  If the so called inventers of these devices would be more skeptical about what they think they've discovered and actually did some real testing before showing a video of their 'overunity device' almost acheiving overunity, we'd have alot less clutter on this web site.

3.  Smot is not overunity.

[lancaIV]

Let us do a step-by-step-evolution:

Bougon US1859764
Henry? ?FR817115

Bode? ? US3895245
Tamke DE3435068
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rust DE10103188? ? ?:? ? ? www.sigmaautomotive.com ;Electrocharger
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rust DE3713965? ? ? ?:? ? ? www.Trinitymotors.net
de Buyst BE438189? ? ? ? ? www.geminielectricmotor.com
HoyerDE2529451
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eustachio EP0051711?: ? ? ?www.e- traction.com ;TheWheel
Zeissler DE19522794

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

p.s.: let us take enough time to develop the appropriate technology for
? ? ? ?the appropriate need !

? ? ? ?There is ever the possibilty of C.O.P.-Overunity,
? ? ? ?there is never the possibility of efficience-Overunity !!!?
? ? ? ?Also ever guilty for each kind of "closed cycle-system"-concept !
? ? ? ?Carnot-Relativity ,ever contribution to the Maxwell/Boltzmann-sphere !

[Omnibus]

1.  Bank accounts and how money is deposited, withdrawn or how interest is earned has nothing to do with energy.

Please notice, it is not I who proposed the analogy with the bank. Nevertheless, for those who don?t get it the bank example can serve as a good illustration.

2.  Omnibus' quote (and belief) that "First, you should convince yourself that the SMOT produces periodically excess energy"  is the basis for so many trivial claims to free energy we see today.  If the so called inventers of these devices would be more skeptical about what they think they've discovered and actually did some real testing before showing a video of their 'overunity device' almost acheiving overunity, we'd have alot less clutter on this web site.

This is a sheer pronouncement on your side because it occurs to you that things are not the way they are. Science doesn?t work that way. Science works through facts and argumentation and not through expressing frivolous opinions such as yours.

Real testing has been done and production of excess energy has been unequivocally demonstrated in a SMOT device. Or you want to abolish science because it doesn?t fit your views?

[quite] 3.  Smot is not overunity. [/quote]

This is your unsupported opinion only which doesn?t mean it reflects the truth just because you?re expressing it.

Your opinion reminds me of the opinions of a population living in a region not far from Sofia, Bulgaria, called ?Shops?. Shops are very nice people with a peculiar philosophy of their own, sometimes very stubborn. For instance, a Shop says

-- ? There?s nothing higher than Vitosha and nothing deeper that the Iskyr? (Vitosha and Iskyr are their mountain and river).

-- ?Why should I worry since my worry will soon pass??

-- ?I hate to think. When I think it?s like I?m wrestling a bear?.

and so on.

One day a Shop visits the zoo. Suddenly he finds himself in front of the giraffe. The Shop starts staring at the giraffe while the poor thing is chewing quietly on its fodder. The Shop keeps staring and staring until concluding finally: ?There is no such animal?.

This sounds pretty much like your conclusion ? a SMOT is right in front of your eyes, it produces periodically excess energy and you?re saying ?SMOT is not overunity?.

People like you want everything sensational. If you don?t find it sensational (while it may really be such) your conclusion is that it is a fake. In other words, you?re trying to impose your perception of ?sensational? as a criterion for the validity of a claim. That?s not science.

[Omnibus]

Let us do a step-by-step-evolution:

Bougon US1859764
Henry   FR817115

Bode    US3895245
Tamke DE3435068
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rust DE10103188     :      www.sigmaautomotive.com ;Electrocharger
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rust DE3713965       :      www.Trinitymotors.net
de Buyst BE438189          www.geminielectricmotor.com
HoyerDE2529451
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eustachio EP0051711 :      www.e- traction.com ;TheWheel
Zeissler DE19522794

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sincerely
            de Lanca

p.s.: let us take enough time to develop the appropriate technology for
       the appropriate need !

       There is ever the possibilty of C.O.P.-Overunity,
       there is never the possibility of efficience-Overunity !!!
       Also ever guilty for each kind of "closed cycle-system"-concept !
       Carnot-Relativity ,ever contribution to the Maxwell/Boltzmann-sphere !]

Please expalin. Not clear what you mean.