Flynn's Parallel Path

[Light]

"flux switching" device shown in the article, it is fundamentally (exactly) the flynn device.
- Yes Jake, sorry, the Jacks motor sits in mind tight. Seems this "flux switching" is a MEG principle, anyway different from Flynn's. But of course needa modulate the magnetic field in certain way to get unbalanced forces.

[jake]

Being somewhat new to this, I don't know what "MEG" means.  What is it?

[hartiberlin]

This is only true in the static case.
If you have a running rotor the system is dynamic and
then the Lentz law comes into play...things then change !

[smarthousesys]

What is very interesting is that Figure 7 in Flynn's STAIF paper shows motor efficiencies quite a bit above 100 per cent at low torque. Sadly I do not have the necessary rights to post the paper itself.

[Elvis Oswald]

Replicated experiments seem to show an increase in magnetic force.  This will make a strong motor, but the implications for transforming power is greater in my mind.  From the first link it seemed like a transformer would double the power applied to the first circuit if setup like this.
You could use half to power the device once started... and since a device of reasonable size would probably use low voltage to manifest the parallel path... you'd have to come up with a way to store that energy.
And the secondary might add something to the whole resonance equation that makes it not work...

But - you might set it in motion with one magnet approaching a coil.  Maybe like the Marks device??  I'd hate to admit that horse wasn't really dead...