Some thoughts

[tsl]

there is an article on the web that i'll recommend to all of you to read and ponder about.even if perhaps allready known stuff is nevertheless worth reading.http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
now another intersting stuff can be found here: http://www.kentech.co.uk/index.html?/tut_self_matched_line.html&2
ok.nice stuff eh? now let us ponder just a bit about the tpu.many of you were saying or just thinking that the tpu tap somehow the power grid.i would agree that it is indeed taping a power grid but not the one you'd think about right now, more later.
let's say that it does just that, taping a power grid and let's ignore the frequency at first.
how would you achieve self amplification of the received signal?
now that would be really cool, right?
the articles mentioned before are both old and the stuff is much older but i have to admit that the idea came to me just not so long ago.i was pondering about the real mechanism that hides inside the tpu and then i had a flash in my mind, what if the so called control coils and the collector coils are to be viewed together as a pulse forming network and more, a self matched transmission line pulse generator.just think about that, what do we have here? a living electrode-the collector coil, a ground plane-the collector coil/s and ofc a dielectric betwen. so we have all that's needed for a transmission line. but in the same time nothing can stop the collector coil be something more, something like part of a rlc tank circuit. if so ,who can stop us from getting a rectifier bridge and use the power received from this rlc circuit to charge the transmission line pulse generator?due to the small capacity there would not be to much received power needed, it can be done.now here it becomes a little tricky.the rlc circuit oscillate at a resonant frequency f1, at a precise time you discharge the pulse (with pulse width being half the wavelength of f1) so that the phases are also perfectly matched, that would result in bigger amplitude of the self oscilations-is that the ringing you're talking gk?.
the oscillations amplitude will begin to dampen but before they come to initial level before the pulse, why not hit the circuit again with just one pulse so you'll have now a even bigger amplitude and again before damped hit it again and so on. as you see you can by carefully selecting the capacitance between the core and the control coils you can obtain a raising amplitude signal that if left uncontrolled will burn out the circuits really fast.
i think you have by now the picture.
any other thoughts someone?

edit-if allready old and discussed idea i apologize, nobody can read all the posts on this board 

[BEP]

@tsl,

I agree both links are very important in the function of a TPU. I've posted both more than once.

I use both methods to force a coil into resonance far below conventional expectations. The first has been in-use for a very long time in un-powered active antenna. Recently, GPS receivers, cell phones and battery eating hand-held receivers use both methods to lower a resonance point or work with signals below the noise threshold.

Use the first and you may be able to light an LED. Use both, maybe a small incandescent light.

Add delay to one side of the transmission line - perhaps even more power.

Add precession rate to both of the above we may have a TPU. So, the question is... where is the power source?

My thoughts on that take me beyond local power lines and radio transmitters.
The source can't be blocked. The polarity is helical. Two coils only will make it quit when turned upside-down. Three or more and the upside-down problem is solved.

At the lowest level a TPU is probably a regenerative receiver but one matching the precession rate of precipitating charge - maybe even causing that precipitation. 

All we must do to collect it is to cancel it with the correct signal (wave former).

BEP

[Grumpy]

What do you call a field that will affect conductors and insulators?

EDIT:

Has anyone experienced moving conductive objects or vibrating dielectric objects in the vicinity of their coils?

[giantkiller]

@tsl,

so that the phases are also perfectly matched, that would result in bigger amplitude of the self oscilations-is that the ringing you're talking gk?.

With a single piece of wire you can achieve an R, an L, an C. The right configuration matched with the right frequency. The wire length(frequency), coil diameter(inductance & impedance), the spacing of the windings(capacitance).

The ringing actually gives us a larger window with which to interact with our pushing pulses. This also lines up with Otto's spec of a negative pulse that would put it in phase with the BEMF. As the initial ringing subsides in the 'primary diminishing echo' that enables us to pick a wave height at a certain time which relates to amplitude for a heterodyned push. In the attached diagram pick a red arrow for the timing you want. You only need to hit one.

Push once in the device or tank ringing to control the amplitude. But if you push trash or uncontrolled then you are pushing in a summing and diminutive effort. That is what my tests ran into. Called freewheeling. The frequency that appeared was the natural resonance of the 6" coil wire length or a subset thereof. The solid state wanted to ring at one frequency but the coil at another.

Look at the SM17 large windings as 2 multiwinds with a spacing of 4" -6" for capacitive storage.

Also,
I found a gas tube power supply that has a 12V input / car battery and 6kv out. I get to skip adding a DC to 120vAC inverter because of newer technology. It runs at a freq fo 30khz. This places a HV of stable frequency as input to the coil. The spark gap appears after the coil to enhance the shock.
I have 45 nonpolarized caps in 3 rows of 15 to equal 102uf @ 12kvac.
With the Kapanadze device running on a 9v battery I believe they have reproduced the Smith device. It is a square TPU.

--gk.

[stprue]

@ all

cool vid even though you have scene examples.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mdfve6sKyXk&feature=fvw