Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hilden-Brand Magnet Motor

Started by JackH, March 10, 2006, 11:58:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

jake

http://www.flynnresearch.net/technology/PPMT%20technology%20white%20paper.pdf

I think the motor design discussed in this paper is the best I have seen so far.

The aspect of the Hilden-Brand "valve" that I don't like is the gap required to make it function.  I'm not sure how big the gap is, but any gap at that location is a bad thing.  If that gap is any larger than a normal stator-rotor gap it is a bad thing.

Flynn's motor does not require a gap (other than normal rotor-stator gap) to function, which I think is a big advantage.  Also, when the Hiledn-Brand valve is "off", all of the PM Flux is doing nothing - it is "short circuited" by design.  In the Flynn design the magnets are being utilized even when the coils are off.  His design makes use of the PM flux at all times, even with the coils off.  The design moves the PM flux from one useful place to another, utilizing all of the PM flux all of the time.  The Hilden-Brand design wastes all of the PM flux part of the time by shunting it through a non-working path when the coil is off.


Nali2001

Is it just me or did anyone else notice that the Jack's picture describing the Hilden-Brand valve is now removed..?
I thought it was on page 14 or so some day's ago.  ???

jake

QuoteThe stator-rotor gap is around 002 on my motors.

If you can get it that close without having the magnets attracting, it sounds like that isn't an issue.

jake

QuoteIs it just me or did anyone else notice that the Jack's picture describing the Hilden-Brand valve is now removed..?

You can see it here:

http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Director:Hilden-Brand_Electromagnet_Motor


MeggerMan

Has nobody figured how this idea can be turned into a motor yet?

This is just one idea I have:
For the flux to switch you need a path for it to flow through.
The smaller the cross section, the higher the flux.
So what you have is instead of a rectangular core across the two main feed/return limbs, you cut a semi circle out of it (the rectangle slab) so the flux at the mid point will be at its maximum for that material.
So this way the circuit is completed, the rotor arm then is attracted to the centre of the semi circle, as it lines up to the centre of the core you need to remove the power from your coil.
The rotor itself will reduce the flux attraction as it approaches the centre point as its own core steel becomes part of the path.

The ideal way would be to get the flux to go through the whole rotor to another valve to complete a circuit.
Anybody done a Femm 4 magnetic simulation on this yet?
I can post the sample I have done if that is possible on this BB.

Ohh, I may be able to get a load of laminated silicon steel offcuts(scrap used in large transformer production).


Regards

Rob