Joule Thief 101

[tinman]

What a great explanation from you. It's as informative as the rest of your explanations.

[MileHigh]

Brad, I really feel like swearing, PW should have picked this up and done the right thing, he will know what I have said is true.

Damn even our Local Resident Clown, MileHigh should know this stuff. Many hundreds of readers here should know this stuff.

It honestly is not hard to see this massive error that TK has made!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

You are actually the resident clown, and if you don't realize that, then you are the hapless unaware resident clown.  Most of the unaware clowning is on the technical side, a clowning of the copy-paste-agasm variety.  You do a lot of "intelligent sounding" copy-pasting but you have no idea if your copy-pasting of legitimate material applies to the issue at hand or not.  You are just doing it like an automaton.  It's all part and parcel of the Dr. Strangelove meets Monty Python aspect of this thread.  You are adding the Monty Python flavour.

[MileHigh]

As it stands, the equation for Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction (E.M.F = -N dϕ_B/dt), does not, at all, predict a Phase Shift of 90 Degrees between E.M.F (measured in Voltage) and the Magnetic Field (ϕ_B) or any other angle as a mater of fact between these two quantitys E.M.F (measured in Voltage) and Magnetic Field (ϕ_B)!

Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction does predict a Phase Shift of 180 Degrees, thanks to Heinrick Lenz, from the Source E.M.F and the Destination E.M.F

Really Dr. Roboto?

You don't understand the implications and ramifications of the equations that you are regurgapasting.  You are just a blank copy-paste automaton.  Does phase shift really have anything to do with it, or is phase shift only used in certain circumstances as a convenient shorthand?

What if ϕ_B is 4?

What if ϕ_B is 17*(sqrt(t))?

What if ϕ_B is A*cos(omega*t)?

What if ϕ_B is K(t^3.67)?

What if ϕ_B is B*sin(omega*7t)?

Inquiring minds want to know.  Automatons need not apply.

[MileHigh]

The issue is, Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction, by definition, predicts EMF, Coulombs of Charge (C), a quantity measured in Volts - The E.M.F and B are Two different things.

Could there be some short circuits taking place in the automaton's positronic brain?  Like Dr. Roboto has some regurgapasting indigestion?  There are no coulombs of charge in sight!!!  We are talking about electric current here.  However, in a capacitor, you define one farad as one coulomb of charge per volt.  So it looks like the robot had a misfire, and the positronic memory banks of the automaton got crossed signals.  Time for a reboot.

[tinman]

Brad, I really feel like swearing, PW should have picked this up and done the right thing, he will know what I have said is true.

Damn even our Local Resident Clown, MileHigh should know this stuff. Many hundreds of readers here should know this stuff.

It honestly is not hard to see this massive error that TK has made!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

The phase relationship is really not defined,and can change in certain circumstances.
My test was at a very low frequency,and phase distortion played no part in the test.

If you and Erfinder really want to rack your brains over something,then watch my next video when i post it,and we throw faradays law of induction out the window

Chris
If you firmly believe in what your saying,then stick to your gun's,and use it as you can to your advantage. You dont need to prove anything to me,TK,or anyone else--only to yourself.
I can only provide the information i feel is true,and that just happens to be the same as the information TK provided.

Of course, the two that i asked the question in relation to induction,where either late for lunch,or did not show up at all--until all the dishes were done.

I guess some like to use conventional current flow,while others like to use true current flow.
But faradays law of induction dose not always hold true,and needs the additives and modifications-some of which you have mentioned.


Brad