Joule Thief 101

[MileHigh]

Be a sad clown if you want.

[EMJunkie]

Be a sad clown if you want.

Certainly not!!!

Like PW bought up and I also said, Waves have a ton or Real Wave content. All starting from the Fundamental. But from the other angle, with "No Fundamental" there is also no Wave Content.

You're poking sticks at an imaginary Snake!!! Really not contributing anything of any value and generally trying to be a pest, is this your intent?

Maybe you are out of your depth here? Again!

This may help some: Significance of Time domain and Frequency domain

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Pirate88179]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TC_CBnqDIU

The best wave I have ever seen.

Seriously, this guy is nuts.

Bill

Really, at least watch the first 30 seconds or until the camera pulls back out.  Almost a perfect sine wave.

[MileHigh]

Maybe you are out of your depth here? Again!

Stop the stupid shtick that you are copying from Brad.  Remember when you had a meltdown when you were asked a ridiculously simple question about a coil that you could not answer and MarkE stepped in and answered it for you?  After months of blabbing all about coils? You are the one that is out of your depth and the best you have been able to do for the past few months is to keep on bumping up your long-dead thread.  You have a long way to go if you are truly interested in electronics.  You quote serious EM stuff and then try to apply it to your nonsensical "partnered output coils."  You revealed your "big demo experiment" of the "partnered coils secret sauce" and it was an under-unity joke showing that you had no clue how to make measurements.  Again, you clearly have a long way to go.

So stop playing games like a clown.  You make an incorrect statement and I corrected you because this stuff is important so I advised you to go back and read what PW said again.

Now be a man and review the material that PW posted and master it so that you can do better experiments.  You need to understand when and where to consider looking at the frequency domain when you want to understand and analyze what a circuit is doing and how it works.  I don't believe you have that skill set right now and John even mentioned way back when that you chose to ignore this important subject matter.

MileHigh

[EMJunkie]

Stop the stupid shtick that you are copying from Brad.  Remember when you had a meltdown when you were asked a ridiculously simple question about a coil that you could not answer and MarkE stepped in and answered it for you?  After months of blabbing all about coils? You are the one that is out of your depth and the best you have been able to do for the past few months is to keep on bumping up your long-dead thread.  You have a long way to go if you are truly interested in electronics.  You quote serious EM stuff and then try to apply it to your nonsensical "partnered output coils."  You revealed your "big demo experiment" of the "partnered coils secret sauce" and it was an under-unity joke showing that you had no clue how to make measurements.  Again, you clearly have a long way to go.

So stop playing games like a clown.  You make an incorrect statement and I corrected you because this stuff is important so I advised you to go back and read what PW said again.

Now be a man and review the material that PW posted and master it so that you can do better experiments.  You need to understand when and where to consider looking at the frequency domain when you want to understand and analyze what a circuit is doing and how it works.  I don't believe you have that skill set right now and John even mentioned way back when that you chose to ignore this important subject matter.

MileHigh

@MilleHehehehe:

Whos the Sad Clown NOW!!!

You keep making up lies Millehehehehe. He who did not even know why a Coax Cable Signal is 62% of Light... and MarkE stepped in and answered it for you!!! Didnt he MilleHehehehe - I posted the Stan Meyer Circuit, with not a single measurement, No-one investigated it properly! You are judging someone elses work, nothing to do with my work!!! Period!!!

Actually, looking at TinselKoala's Channel, the Circuit I posted, that TK built, still remains the best Input to Neon Light experiment he has ever done! Infact, it kept producing light, with more Neon's being added, untill the Enamel burnt off the Coils... This alone speaks volumes to a sane mind MilleHehehehe

So youre are full of it!!! Dont talk crap!!!!


@Bill - Nice video!!! Thats a Thumbs Up from me!


@MilleHehehehe - Again.

OU.com has seen more OU successes since I came back here than ever before! People are understanding "How" to invoke Electricity on the terminals of their coils now. Its still something you have light years of study to understand, even after I have done all the hard work for you!

I never proclaimed to know everything like you do MilleHehehehe!!! In-fact, I openly admit that I learn new things all the time, not to admit it is just arrogant isnt it?

Old mate, youre out of your depth as soon as you get up in the morning, thats the sad thing!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org