Joule Thief 101

[tinman]

@ Minnie & MH

Well minnie/MH,it seems we have a problem.
As i need to brush up on my induction skills,i am awaiting your input.
Which is the correct wave form(scope shot) for the below circuit ?.

Maybe MH might even like to have a go at this one.
Which is correct MH--surly you are full bottles on plain old induction

Is it the first scope shot/schematic that is correct,or is it the second scope shot with same attached schematic that is correct?.

Either of you two dare to answer>?


Brad

[MileHigh]

Blah blah blah
Trying for the big bailout already.
Changing the terms and conditions to suit your own need to be right.
But you have just found out that you are wrong again<--yes,again MH.

Brad

Bla bla my ass Dr. Brainfry.  Do your big reveal in two days showing how a magnet "dissipates energy."

Here is my definition of a magnet "dissipating energy:"  There is a continuous flow of heat power or electrical power due to the presence of the magnet and there are no external mechanisms that are adding power to the magnet itself.  In other words, no moving of the magnet, no aiming heat lamps at the magnet, no nothing.

What you seem to be saying is that a magnet just sitting there on a table is "dissipating energy" and for me "dissipating energy" means that somehow the magnet is allegedly a continuous source of some form of power.  I am stating this because with your serious language and communication issues, you could find some way to "weasel" your way into "being right."

No monkeyshines, no Bizarro World anti-logic.  No twisted obtuse spaghetti English that could be interpreted five different ways.  Make sentences that are properly constructed and comprehensible and not ambiguous.  No requirement for a secret decoder ring to understand what you are saying.  You have to be real.

[EMJunkie]

Bla bla my ass Dr. Brainfry.

The response of a true Genius! Well done!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

author=MileHigh link=topic=8341.msg479834#msg479834 date=1460077518]



Oh-more terms and conditions to suit your needs MH

My English is just fine -thank you. But what has become outstanding in this thread,is your lack of knowledge in the simplest of thing's,and how much you have actually got wrong in this thread.
Then you do the old twisty turny thingy to try and weasel your way out of your own mistakes lol--but with epic fails all over the place.

Post 1340- Quote:  But the actual engine itself, the pistons, the valves, the camshaft, the crankcase, the ignition, etc, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with resonance.

Lol.

Post 1534 Quote: Good, so that patent shows a resonant cavity in the combustion chamber can be used to improve the performance of a two-stroke engine.  And you also put up a link showing how resonance in the cylinder of a typical four-stroke automobile engine reduces performance.  So there is no simple one-size-fits all answer and things have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  So that one is a draw.

No MH-thats not a draw. Another attempt at avoiding the fact that you were once again wrong lol.
What that is,is showing you that you have no idea what you are talking about

Your claim once again- But the actual engine itself, the pistons, the valves, the camshaft, the crankcase, the ignition, etc, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with resonance.
So i post the very thing you say dose not exist-both good and bad,and you try and call it a draw lol.
No no no-it was another loss on your behalf--another false load of crap from you.
I show where resonance exist throughout an ICE,and how that resonance increases both efficiency and power,while you waffle on about how it dose not even exist lol.
Another epic fail on your behalf MH.

Here is my definition of a magnet "dissipating energy:"

Lucky for us,you do not get to make the definition of energy dissipation.
Energy is dissipated when work is being done. Work must be done to align the magnetic domains of a magnetic material<-- dont forget that one MH.

There is a continuous flow of heat power or electrical power due to the presence of the magnet

What a lot of crap. Since when dose a continuous flow of anything needed to show that work was done. If we switch on a light,and then switch it back of,so as the flow was not continuous,was work done?
Like i said,it is a good thing we dont go by your demented rules of work being done,or what dissipated energy is.

What you seem to be saying is that a magnet just sitting there on a table is "dissipating energy"

Thats not what i said at all. Dose a battery dissipate energy just sitting there with no interaction with anything else?.

and for me "dissipating energy" means that somehow the magnet is allegedly a continuous source of some form of power.  I am stating this because with your serious language and communication issues, you could find some way to "weasel" your way into "being right."

You need to go brush up on your energy dissipation example's.

You are going to fall into another of your holes you dug MH.


Brad

[tinman]

 author=MileHigh link=topic=8341.msg479834#msg479834 date=1460077518]

Bla bla my ass Dr. Brainfry.

So whats it going to be MH--Scope shot 1,or scope shot 2 for the attached schematic?

Are you going to side with TK,because he is your mate,and you dislike EMJ?
Or are you going to think for your self for once,and answer with what you think is correct.
!OR! are you not going to answer,as you have no idea your self how induction actually work's.

My guess is that you will say nothing--will not answer the question,as you just do not know,and do not want to make your self look any worse than you already do.

And where is that mate of yours-minnie,who said i need to brush up on my induction skill's


Brad