STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[gyulasun]

Paul, I bow to your superior knowledge.  I guess there is no point in presenting my test data on my build because you have it sorted...

Sorry guys...

Hi Dave,

Very nicely built steorn you have! Please would you reconsider your decision and go ahead with your measured data, I am sure many of us would appreciate it (except maybe one arrogant man).

The more info can be collected the easier will be to crack steorn secrets.

rgds, Gyula

[lumen]

Why wonder about the patent issues?
Even if Steorn stands to make billions off royalties, can you imagine what the company selling the first free energy home generator would make?

At this point, I would like to first see something able to sustain operation from all the FREE energy.

[mondrasek]

Paul, I bow to your superior knowledge.  I guess there is no point in presenting my test data on my build because you have it sorted...

Nonsense!  Data is exactly what I would like to see.  Thank you for a most impressive build and offer to share.

M.

[CTG Labs]

Hi Gyula,

Yes, I will post my data, but for the betterment of the forum and not my ego (like someone we could mention)...


Regards,

Dave.

Hi Dave,

Very nicely built steorn you have! Please would you reconsider your decision and go ahead with your measured data, I am sure many of us would appreciate it (except maybe one arrogant man).

The more info can be collected the easier will be to crack steorn secrets.

rgds, Gyula

[gravityblock]

@CTG:

Very nice replication.  We don't have it all sorted out and need all of the data we can get from replicators.  What type of core and dimensions, how is the core positioned, number of turns, what gauge wire, pulse width, power input, strength of magnets and size, polarity of dual magnets, scope shots, RPM's, run time, recovery circuit, COP measurements, etc.

@all:

Quite a few people said they ordered the Metglas cores, but I have only seen data from one person, PL.  We need this data.  There is a possibility more than one type of core will work above unity.  We can then find out what these cores have in common and improve on it with tape wound cores that are more customized for the greatest efficiency.

We also need to have a number of tests done on each replication, such as is there a net EMF induced in the toroid from the rotor magnets?  An easy way to test this is to run it until it reaches a high RPM, then disconnect the power and check the voltage across the toroid as it's decreasing in RPM.  If there is voltage on this test (CEMF), then the dual magnets will need to be re-aligned with the toroid and the gap between the dual magnets may also need to be adjusted and any wobble in the rotor will need to be eliminated.  I'm getting 2mv induced in the toroidal coil spinning it by hand, so I need a little bit more precision.

I did some tests with a generator coil.  There was twice as much voltage induced in the generator coil when the dual magnets are like poles with a metal backing plate than when the dual magnets are opposite poles with a backing plate.  This was a very crude test and the poor alignment of the generator coil with the dual magnets could be the reason for the differences.  Another possiblity is the field from the like poles may be spread out more and cutting more of the coil than with opposite poles. My system only runs with the dual magnets being like poles, weird.  It must be the shaft collar I'm using for my core or the strength of my magnets, lol.

I would like to hear more about the generator coils.  The Orbo is using an air coil for the generator part, right?  Does both of the dual magnets cut the generator coil, or only one of the magnets?  If both of the dual magnets cut the generator coil, then which configuration of the dual magnets (like or opposite poles) would induce more EMF in the generator coils?  Would there be a configuration where drawing current from the generator coil work with the rotor instead of against the rotor or maybe have no net effect on the rotor?

Thanks,

GB