Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

teslaalset

Quote from: Omnibus on May 20, 2010, 08:46:11 AM
Thanks for the link. It is my understanding that per cycle the energy that characterizes those losses is only given by the area enclosed within the hysteresis curve. In any event, like I said, those losses would give an even greater OU effect if included in the energy balance discussed here.

I had a look at your latest excel results.
One crucial thing about your method of calculating P=V*I is that you have to take the absolute values,
If V or I is negative you can't use a negative value, because that leads to negative Power results.

Using absolute values leads to below result. Much more realistic.

Omnibus

You know, that was a question I had from the very beginning. One thing is for sure, the Joule heating has to be always positive (it is anyway because I is squared). As for the other energy we should be careful about the physical meaning. Negative energy is returning energy to the power supply. If there is such and you take it with its absolute value then in cases where per cycle there would be no net energy (say all energy put in comes back as in the cases of an inductor) then you would incorrectly assess the output energy instead of being zero being double the calculated value. Thus, it seems to me one should put it in the energy balance equation as what it really is and not always consider it only positive.

teslaalset

Quote from: Omnibus on May 20, 2010, 04:08:40 PM
You know, that was a question I had from the very beginning. One thing is for sure, the Joule heating has to be always positive (it is anyway because I is squared). As for the other energy we should be careful about the physical meaning. Negative energy is returning energy to the power supply. If there is such and you take it with its absolute value then in cases where per cycle there would be no net energy (say all energy put in comes back as in the cases of an inductor) then you would incorrectly assess the output energy instead of being zero being double the calculated value. Thus, it seems to me one should put it in the energy balance equation as what it really is and not always consider it only positive.

I agree with you on this.
The sign of the power can be negative if it's generated power.

Omnibus

Case in point. See the 170kHz run for a sine wave. That seems to be the ultimate OU machine if energy balance is calculated right because you drive it only to obtain energy without spending any. All electrical energy is returned back to the supply and in addition you get Joule heat.


Omnibus