STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[Omnibus]

@Omega_0,

There might have been loose connection in the previous data as well. Also, the transformer as well as the resistor are getting very hot so I have to disconnect them from the power and wait till they cool down before taking the data. So, here are the data for the transformer as well as for the resistor. It appears that the resistor behaves equally as well as an OU device as the transformer. I know how it sounds but I'm presenting the data the way I'm obtaining it. We'll see in the end what the truth is.

[Omnibus]

I just got the current probe. Now, what's holding me back is the 12V, 4.2A power supply. They say it'll take two to three weeks to get it. These power supplies are like gold, I was told. Can you believe it? Having all this equipment and a power supply holding you back. Incredible. I'm going out to see if I can't borrow it from some nearby university.

Redacted: No joy. Checked at two universities--at the physics department and at the electrical engineering department. No probes-- we already know that-- and no power supplies.

[Omnibus]

You forgot to multiply by 100 the result of what you got across your 0.001 resistor, its why you get 10 time more, Omega_0 was right.

No, this was an error due to loose connection. See the latest spreadsheets.

Also, in the latest transformer spreadsheet there's another slight error. Use the value 63,5148Ohms instead of the 61.0425Ohms. The latter value is for the resistance of the resistor used instead of the transformer. That's inconsequential for the reality of the effect but has to be corrected nevertheless.

[Bruce_TPU]

@Omega_0,

There might have been loose connection in the previous data as well. Also, the transformer as well as the resistor are getting very hot so I have to disconnect them from the power and wait till they cool down before taking the data. So, here are the data for the transformer as well as for the resistor. It appears that the resistor behaves equally as well as an OU device as the transformer. I know how it sounds but I'm presenting the data the way I'm obtaining it. We'll see in the end what the truth is.

To once again quote a source from whom I have, from day one, believed he told the truth, said the following:

Steven Mark-

"The very FIRST example I gave you was that;
It is common scientific knowledge that if you have a piece of wire and first run electricity through it you will have a small kick when first energized.
The kick is universally attributed to the earth's magnetic field.
OK the point is; YOU CAN GET SOME ENERGY OUT OF THE EARTH!
Next point; YOU CAN DO SOMETHING VERY SIMPLE WITH A WIRE TO SHOW THIS.
Next point; YOU CAN SEE THAT YOU CAN GET MORE OUT OF A PIECE OF WIRE THEN YOU PUT IN TO IT.
WE are not talking about a coil or a transformer or anything developing a primary to secondary flux.
We are just talking about a straight piece of wire, some electrons and a method of measuring what comes out of it.
Some people just sit back and say, well that isn't very much power, we want to make much more.
In order to run you must walk first.
I told you that the simplest form of over unity is a piece of wire and a voltage source.
Anyone can actually connect it and measure.
See for yourself the kick. NO coil no xmrs, just a kick.
That should tell you learned gentleman that there exists a form of energy convertible and useable which is directly related to a simple piece of wire and instantaneous electron flow.."

Cheers,

Bruce

[Omega_0]

Omnibus,

In the data for 61 ohm resistor, the Vpeak is 8V and Ipeak is 0.75 (1A to 0.5A), which gives a resistance of 8/0.75 = 10 ohms

If the Resistor is really 61 ohms the peak current should not exceed 8/61 = 0.13 Amps
But the amazing thing is that your scope shows it touching 1 Amps on -ve side (10x more), I don't know the reason.

It would be good to check the peak current using a normal analog meter....