STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[IceStorm]

Another lie. My goal is not to be a comedian. It is to find OU.

But I wanted to warn you, that the ignorant physicist at the highly regarded Hyperphysics website are spreading anti-Omni power calculations.

Regards, Larry

If after that he still denied the fact that he is wrong i really dont know what you can do more to wake him up.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

[Omnibus]

If after that he still denied the fact that he is wrong i really dont know what you can do more to wake him up.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

Trying to prove that someone is lying by random multiplication by arbitrary factors, as @LarryC is doing is nothing but comical. That's a performance of a bad comedian, though. If he's interested in proving OU he should get some education first and not disturb threads with legitimate discussions by imposing his confusion.

[Omnibus]

Another lie. My goal is not to be a comedian. It is to find OU.

But I wanted to warn you, that the ignorant physicist at the highly regarded Hyperphysics website are spreading anti-Omni power calculations.

Regards, Larry

If you really want to find OU you swhould first educate yourself. It's OK to cite hyperphysics as long as you understand what is explains. For instance, you should know better than insisting that it proves your point when you read that what's discussed there are the effective values of voltage and current. I am not using the effective values of the voltage and current in my calculations. 

Thus, you are the liar. I've never said that hyperphysics is wrong. What I said is that you're wrong and don't understand what hyperphysics teaches you. What's even worse, you're trying to impose your confusion with the matter on everybody else here, which is reprehensible. 

[broli]

@Omnibus: would it be reasonable to assume that if a controlled test on dc was performed of same average power calculated through the resistive part that this would yield the same temperature from a temperature probe? Since cop is rather high either temperature remains in the same ball park or is as much as 3 times lower.

[Omnibus]

@broli,

Of all I'm seeing I have no reason to believe temperature rise is any different than it would be as expected from the first Joule's law. In other words, if we have current I passing through resistance R the heat generated per unit time would be I^2R which will give rise to a certain temperature. Like I said, however, I'm working on some developments right now and will get back to you as soon as I get more results. I'm keeping an eye on the forum but will get more technical when I get ready.