STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[PaulLowrance]

Two new videos from Bedini :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wn4CTirVNbo&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25qzc8KhMM8&feature=channel

For me it's becoming rather clear who bedini is and what's been happening to the "free energy" community for decades. Very sad, but we'll win this battle! bedini's been playing his role for decades.

[mikestocks2006]

Posting this as a reference on COP > 1 , even COP>3 at times.
On COP>1 especially as it relates to heat transfer systems, cooling/heating.
Something to keep in mind when using heat energy balance energy calculations as part of OU verification. Depending ofcource on the system under examination.

"A geothermal heat pump operating at COPheating 3.5 provides 3.5 units of heat for each unit of energy consumed (e.g. 1 kWh consumed would provide 3.5 kWh of output heat). The output heat comes from both the heat source and 1 kWh of input energy, so the heat-source is cooled by 2.5 kWh, not 3.5 kWh.

A heat pump of COPheating 3.5, such as in the example above, could be less expensive to use than even the most efficient gas furnace."

A heat pump cooler operating at COPcooling 2.0 removes 2 units of heat for each unit of energy consumed (e.g. such an air conditioner consuming 1 kWh would remove heat from a building's air at a rate of 2 kWh).

The COP of heat pumps (300%-350% efficient) make them much more efficient than high-efficiency gas-burning furnaces (90-99% efficient), and electric heating (100%). However, this does not always mean they are less expensive to operate. The 2008 US average price per therm (100,000 BTU) of electricity was $3.33 while the average price per therm of natural gas was $1.33.[1] Using these prices, a heat pump with a COP of 3.5 would cost $0.95[2] to provide one therm of heat, while a high efficiency gas furnace with 95% efficiency would cost $1.40[3] to provide one therm of heat. With these average prices, the heat pump costs 32% less[4] to provide the same amount of heat. The savings (if any) will depend on the actual cost of electricity and natural gas, which can both vary widely."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_performance
also http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/heat-pump-efficiency-ratings-d_1117.html

[hartiberlin]

This coil configuration from John Bedini
runs even better with the iron tube inside the coil:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYh8W3_EZjc

The current almost drops to zero and the rotor speeds up !

I wonder, if the magnets are attracted in the first case
to the coil or does it run without the iron core in
repelling mode ?

[PaulLowrance]

This coil configuration from John Bedini
runs even better with the iron tube inside the coil:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYh8W3_EZjc

The current almost drops to zero and the rotor speeds up !

I wonder, if the magnets are attracted in the first case
to the coil or does it run without the iron core in
repelling mode ?

When he puts the metal bar in the coil, the current is ~ 10mA and the voltage is ~ 13V, which is ~ 130mW. I used to be a huge bedini fan ages ago, but he's still playing these games. Ask yourself why bedini doesn't use a current meter that's more sensitive.

[hartiberlin]

Coming back to the Steorn principle:

It would be interesting to test
if a series of pulses , maybe 10 pulses for only 1/5th tau ontime time intervals
with some mikroseconds of offtime between them
for one attraction cycle of the magnet versus ferrite core would help
to save input energy.

Maybe this is what Sean from Steorn will show in his next demo and what Ben was reffering to ?