STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[maw2432]

The build is shown better in this earlier video. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcacRwjsY7w

Bill

[teslaalset]

Some results on the calorimetric Tests performed on Orbo:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/eorbo/5-calorimetric-tests.aspx

The way I interpret these result is that they claim that a non-rotating Orbo produces less heat than a running Orbo both consuming 3.8 Watt.
It does not show COP>1 in this way in my view.

[Airstriker]

http://www.steorn.com/orbo/eorbo/4-inductive-gain.aspx

As I remember there was a question whether the magnets themselfs saturate the core completely at the TDC. Well here is the answer:

As can be seen from the results, there was a net decrease in inductance when the two magnets on the rotor were facing the toroid. This is because the magnets saturated the toroid's core when they were in that position. This saturation resulted in a change in the core's magnetic permeability and, hence, a change in the inductance of the coil.

I also suggest reading all ot the information published under:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/solidstate/
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/eorbo/
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/pm/

Especially the pmORBO papers are interesting - I don't think they have been published anywhere before.

[Omnibus]

Some results on the calorimetric Tests performed on Orbo:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/eorbo/5-calorimetric-tests.aspx

The way I interpret these result is that they claim that a non-rotating Orbo produces less heat than a running Orbo both consuming 3.8 Watt.
It does not show COP>1 in this way in my view.

Indeed, such heat difference will be observed with an ordinary non-OU pulse motor as well. If they were to demonstrate OU calorimetrically they should've calibrated the system with a resistor to see how much of the input 3.8W without rotor goes for non-heating losses. Once that is known then it should be compared with the excess heat when the rotor is spinning. If there is OU that excess heat should be greater than the energy spent for non-heating losses.

That calorimetry experiment was unnecessary and I think Steorn gave in into the zealous activists' agenda to muddle the issue. The integration experiment in their last demo, carefully done, is enough as a proof of OU. It needs to be confirmed by independent parties but, sadly, there's none in sight with that level of equipment. Here lies the greatest problem Steorn are facing -- they are way ahead of everybody.

[mikestocks2006]

Hi folks, what do you think about this?
Searching for publications about Steorn and possible info on pm-orbo and e-orbo this showed up:

Steorn and The Holy Grail click here

If anyone has red it, please post any relevant info data/tests etc  Does it also include ss-orbo developments?
Thanks
Mike


Ps: As a side note,  an interesting coincidence how close the publication day of the book and the starting day of this thread, announcement of e-orbo upcoming events/demos etc.