Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 46 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Quote from: blueplanet on June 28, 2010, 11:15:52 AM
I presume your pulse source is not sinusoidal. And I presume it is not 555 type, because 555 would unlikely end you up with 100 Mhz.

But all the waveforms you showed us were sinusoidal. If there is no low-pass filtering, what gives you a sinusoidal waveforms?

On the contrary, the pulse source is sinusoidal -- HP8116A pulse/function generator in sinusoidal mode (50% duty cycle).

Omnibus

Quote from: blueplanet on June 28, 2010, 11:05:21 AM
A Hall effect CT is a low pass filter. Why don't you just show us the input/output current waveforms in the neighborhood of 41 MHz? Perhaps, we can learn something from there.

So, why is then the current measured with the current probe coinciding with the current measured with the shunt? The shunt isn't a low pass filter.

broli

@omnibus, I ask of you yet another favor  :-[ .

Using the parameters that give the most highest negative slope. Could you please share exact frequency and time difference between voltage and current wave.

blueplanet

Like what I said before, please show us the current waveforms in time domain for the load and for the bifilar coil in the neighborhood of 41 Mhz. The computed Pout/Pin ratio is meaningless to us if we don't know how the sign of the current changes at 41 Mhz. Period.




Quote from: Omnibus on June 28, 2010, 11:19:54 AM
So, why is then the current measured with the current probe coinciding with the current measured with the shunt? The shunt isn't a low pass filter.

broli

Quote from: blueplanet on June 28, 2010, 11:46:57 AM
Like what I said before, please show us the current waveforms in time domain for the load and for the bifilar coil in the neighborhood of 41 Mhz. The computed Pout/Pin ratio is meaningless to us if we don't know how the sign of the current changes at 41 Mhz. Period.

First of all, what have I missed? Why are you stuck with that 41Mhz value while the OU experiments are at 700 kHz? And if you go back a few pages he has shared both the data of the inductor as a reference test case with only a resistor. The data could be meaningless to YOU but definitely not "us" who know how to use it.

This is why little gets achieved here. Either it's some secret box of magic, or someone is completely open with his experiments and data and people keep going back to 0. At some point you have to accept the data you found in order to progress or else you'll keep going in circles never achieving anything.