Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

blueplanet

Quote from: Omnibus on July 03, 2010, 04:06:19 AM
The observations are done at Ein = const. That's the condition of the problem and as such cannot be changed whimsically.

You probably have removed the resistor when you did the measurment of Pin. That may be the reason why you ended up with constant Ein over time. Ein will never be constant because there is something in the circuit.

Constant Ein is not a sign of OU. It is a sign of incorrect measurement.


Omnibus

Quote from: blueplanet on July 03, 2010, 04:43:39 AM
You probably have removed the resistor when you did the measurment. That may be the reason you end up with constant Ein. Ein will never be constant because there is something circuit.

Constant Ein is not a sign OU. It is a sign of incorrect measurement.


So, the problem with Vr is settled. You were wrong and you should admit it. Never bring Vr again.

blueplanet

The problem with Vr is NOT settled. Some of your graphs that you posted in the forum can be used to derive Vr and Vin.


Quote from: Omnibus on July 03, 2010, 04:45:41 AM

So, the problem with Vr is settled. You were wrong and you should admit it. Never bring Vr again.

Omnibus

Quote from: teslaalset on July 03, 2010, 04:43:38 AM
@Omnibus, can you post the file again, that shows these results, I interested in having a look at the details. If it is too big, please e-mail to me?

I haven't posted that file. Here's a similar file with more realistic R and C -- 1Ohm and 10pF -- yielding negative input energy-time slope:


Omnibus

Quote from: blueplanet on July 03, 2010, 04:50:18 AM
The problem with Vr is NOT settled. Some of your graphs that you posted in the forum can be used to derive Vr and Vin.

Like I said, Vr cannot be found in any of my theoretical calculations or in the graphs based on these theoretical calculations. Admit you're wrong and move on.