STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[exnihiloest]

This is more of the same incompetent blabber you're filling the bandwidth of this forum with. The silly thing is you've heard that mantra and you're repeating it without any chance to prove what you're preaching. Why? Because you don't know what you're talking about. If you knew what you're talking about then you would've been able to prove that "If energy was not conserved, these laws would not be internally consistent." Why can't you prove that? Because it is simply not true. You have a feeling it is true but it isn't. You've heard somewhere someone say it's true but it isn't. Same as with the Einstein's "theory" of relativity -- a truly internally inconsistent theory and yet existing in the mainstream (one of the biggest mistakes science has done ever). You have absolutely no clue what that "theory" is but are arrogant enough to express opinions about it and about internal consistency. What nerve. As for energy, you don't get that energy has a deeper meaning than your limited way of understanding it and that under certain circumstances there is no need to have a pre-existing energy reservoir in order for energy to be produced. Let alone you don't understand that even the laws you mention are not a still entity but are prone to development and further understanding. You are not a scientist but are some kind of engineer at best and instead of taking care of your practical engineering duties you are laboriously expressing opinions on matters you don't understand thus clogging the discussions and disrupting them. That has to stop.

Poor omnibus, always limited to personal attacks when it is obvious he is wrong.
A theory has to be revised only if there are new facts and observations not yet modelized. Omnibus method is the contrary: he wants the facts to fit his inconsistant theories (if we can call "theory" his successions of words without meaning that nevertheless he holds above Einstein's relativity).
He want one proves him that Einstein's relativity and all the laws of physics are internally consistant. If he understood them, his question would be needless.
We are not here, I presume, for the education of the nutcases of the worst species, that one not only denying all the human scientific knowledge, regarding Einstein as a crank, seeing OU everywhere in ordinary phenomena which are known since the 19th century, but also refusing to learn from the best minds of science by lack of intellectual exigence and preferring to confine itself in preposterous verbiage and lucubrations outside of any science.
We are here, I presume, for searching for new energy.
You pretend OU is a reality? Then show us beyond any doubts a perpetual motion that any independent team can duplicate. And laws of physics will be possibly revised. Otherwise the method is to work, learn and experiment instead of raving and claiming "It is OU. I got it! Yes it is OU. Steorn is OU! Einstein is an idiot. I affirm it is OU. Therefore it is OU".

[Omnibus]

What an incompetent nonsense ... The semi-educated @exnihiloest continuing to shamelessly spew his confusion in this forum. What a nerve.

[spinn_MP]

What an incompetent nonsense ... The self-educated @OmniBot continuing to shamelessly spew his confusion in this forum. What a nerve.

There, I corrected it for you...

Indeed, what a nerve you have... So far, you're leading the "most deluded opportunist on all of the FE boards" competition...
Naturally, you never showed anything of value, you're just specialized in hyper-productive nonsense spewing.. +4000 attempts at hitchhiking someone others posts...

Pathetic.

"I proved without a reason of a doubt..Bla blabla bla..."

Idiot.
Case closed.

[Thaelin]

I have to add some thing to this. Note that this last bash has only 17 posts. One of the same bunch, just new user name. I see it here a lot.

The key here is if the person "does" allow him or her self to be misled, then that person is the only one responsible for it. If you feel totally right with your findings, then stand firm with it and drop the 8 bottom plow and drive it forward. Remember IBM of all said that the personal computer would be of no use really to anyone and turned it down. Now look.

Omni plows forward as do I. I get told my ideas are junk too but hang on.

thay

[Omnibus]

What I have shown in the field of OU is known to many. I have proved conclusively that OU is real. Who are you? A mean little twerp annoying people with his useless presence. That's who you are. There are several others doing the same who don't know their place. Since you don't know who you are I'll say it agai -- you're a little annoying nothing, having done absolutely nothing in the field of OU, hindering the discussions with gibberish. That should stop, if not, you'll keep hearing it.