Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power

Started by gotoluc, December 07, 2009, 05:32:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Well not even worth a video on the solenoid setup. I had to use 5 times as much power to achieve the 500 gram pull force.

Your on to something great here Luc-time to make the same type of setup i think-but one more thing to try first. So the idea is to achieve 500 gram's of pull force,using only .432 watts.


telecom

Hi Luc,
I keep thinking about this aspect of the testing:
For example, if you do the lifting test once per second,it
consists of on/of duty cycle, which means that you apply  power only
half of the time of the cycle, which will be 0.2 W, instead of .4 W per second, to perform the same work.
Which means that for the present setup of 500g pull, you only need to lift
it twice per second by 2 cm to reach OU. If you do it more often - you are in a surplus territory.

tinman

Quote from: telecom on August 18, 2014, 09:21:15 AM
Hi Luc,
I keep thinking about this aspect of the testing:
For example, if you do the lifting test once per second,it
consists of on/of duty cycle, which means that you apply  power only
half of the time of the cycle, which will be 0.2 W, instead of .4 W per second, to perform the same work.
Which means that for the present setup of 500g pull, you only need to lift
it twice per second by 2 cm to reach OU. If you do it more often - you are in a surplus territory.
This is an interesting test,but what are the ruel's based around the test.?
Would this be allowed-we have a spring sitting under the 500g weight.If Luc can get the weight with spring into resonance,and the 500g weight is lifted that 2cm's twice a minute,dose that still count?-are we aloud to use the spring. If a spring is not an energy source,then i dont see why not. this would then become like a kid on a trampoline.

gotoluc

Thanks TinMan for making this excellent test setup using a standard motor.
Your 1 to 1 pulley is the right way to go to compere a standard motor pull force to my design.
You spring idea also sounds good.

@ telecom, when I came up with this design 5 years ago I ordered many large 2" square by 1" thick N52 magnets to build a super powerful version of it.
I never did build it because most said it wouldn't give OU and then the topic died.
I still have at least 10 or more of these super magnets in the original delivery box in storage . Today they are worth a fortune compared to when I purchased them.
I guess it's time to open the box and build the thing to see the real results!

I was thinking to build one that's at least 8 inches wide by using 4 of these 2" wide by 1 " thick magnets next to each other. That way most of the coils outer magnetic field is used. Only 1" on each sides where I attache the guides would be lost compared to my latest design where only half of the outer field is used.

Luc