Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power

[Khwartz]

Interesting excerpt from the previous Jim Murray and Paul Babcock's video, not on phase offsetting but about something looks to me very similar to what you've discovered, Luc, about adding magnets and core:

Time 00:20 to 00:22, slide "The Torque Measurement versus Flux Density Test":

~" The relation is always proportional, even when you exceed to the point you enter in saturation: the torque continues to go up as a direct function of the number of the lines*".

(*: I gess "lines of magnetic flux).

[synchro1]

This "Telos Quadra" research paper was suppressed for nearly 15 years! Look at this paperblowoff test: The small paper dot cut from 20lb paper is ejected off of  the top of the coils when the coils are excited with a trigger  pulse.

Ask yourselves what effect, running D.C. current through the toroid coils, would have on the paper dot? Luc noticed a difference in magnetic attraction when he discharged a Joule package from a capacitor through a serially connected bifilar. What do the twin toroids have in common with the seial bifilar wrap? Might there be a connection?

The pulsed twin toroids fires a nail from the core at high velocity. The "A" vector is not part of the curved field but extends in a straight line from the neutral zone towards infinity. Aiming the pulsed magnet ray at a steel carving knife from the twin toroids would have the same effect on the knife as aiming a pulse from a ferrite core series bifilar solenoid. A dramatic effect!

[synchro1]

Sorry Synchro1 but that is just another nonsensical fantasy posting.  I don't want to disrupt the thread, but that is the honest rebuttal to your posting.  You have made other fantasy postings in this thread that disrupt what is going on.  I will ignore them from now on.

This kind of routine insult from Milehigh is extremely egregious when I'm making a legitimate point backed up by solid reference data like the kind presented in the "Telos Quadra" test! Maybe someone should scold him for a change!

[hanon]

Hi Luc,

This post is about your video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTykNjDD0CM

It is just to reference you, for your info,  this other video about this scheme , published in hyiq.org about Bucking Coils:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-V1z2TdQJA

I suppose that if in your video you would have used an intermediate tap between the CW coil and the CCW coil to extract the induced voltage you would have got current without the Lenz effect...

The concept about bucking coils is very interesting to me, and it seem to have been used in many overunity devices: http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

[Pirate88179]

Hi Luc,

The concept about bucking coils is very interesting to me, and it seem to have been used in many overunity devices: http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf

Many overunity devices?  No offense intended but, could you please just name one that has been tested and proven?  I see this stated many times here but I have never seen any proof of any devices that have been really tested to be O.U.

Thanks,

Bill