Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



7.8 Hertz Resonant Circuit

Started by braden, December 09, 2009, 11:41:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tim123

Quote from: Groundloop on December 13, 2013, 08:14:39 AM
Hi Tim
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances

Hi Groundloop,
  ok, found it:

"The real Earth–ionosphere waveguide is not a perfect electromagnetic resonant cavity. Losses due to finite ionosphere electrical conductivity lower the propagation speed of electromagnetic signals in the cavity, resulting in a resonance frequency that is lower than would be expected in an ideal case, "

Oh, no that's back to front... 7.83 is a higher frequency than 7.14. Hmmm, so - no that's not it then...

Which part of the page do you think explains the phenomena?

Regards, Tim

Groundloop

Quote from: tim123 on December 13, 2013, 09:42:28 AM
Hi Groundloop,
  ok, found it:

"The real Earth–ionosphere waveguide is not a perfect electromagnetic resonant cavity. Losses due to finite ionosphere electrical conductivity lower the propagation speed of electromagnetic signals in the cavity, resulting in a resonance frequency that is lower than would be expected in an ideal case, "

Oh, no that's back to front... 7.83 is a higher frequency than 7.14. Hmmm, so - no that's not it then...

Which part of the page do you think explains the phenomena?

Regards, Tim

Tim,

Consider the distance between earth surface and the top of the Ionosphere as a waveguide.
Then use your math to find the frequency based on the thickness of the waveguide.

GL.

tim123

Quote from: Groundloop on December 13, 2013, 01:44:09 PM
Tim,
Consider the distance between earth surface and the top of the Ionosphere as a waveguide.
Then use your math to find the frequency based on the thickness of the waveguide.

Hi GL,
  - distance between earth surface and the top of the Ionosphere  = 600Km
- a waveguide of 600 Km has a cutoff frequency of about 250Hz

I'm no wiser... Would you mind giving a full explanation?

Groundloop

Quote from: tim123 on December 13, 2013, 02:29:19 PM
Hi GL,
  - distance between earth surface and the top of the Ionosphere  = 600Km
- a waveguide of 600 Km has a cutoff frequency of about 250Hz

I'm no wiser... Would you mind giving a full explanation?

Hi Tim,

Quote:

"The fundamental mode frequency for Schumann resonance
is a standing wave in the Earth–ionosphere cavity with
a wavelength equal to the circumference of the Earth."

End quote.

My personal view is that the above conclusion is not correct.
I do not think that the cavity theory explains the observed reality.

The theoretical frequency is found to be 7,48Hz.

(The circumference of the earth at the equator is 40075,16 kilometers.
Speed of light, c = 299792458 meters per second.
Frequency = 299792458 / 40075160 = 7,48 Hz.)

The real frequency measured is 7,83Hz. When a real measurement
is different from the predicted theoretical value, then one must
conclude that the theory is wrong.

My theory is that the observed frequency is the result of reflections
of radio frequency energy from the different layers in the Ionosphere
and that some ELF frequencies more easy can be reflected.

So the RF energy from the lightning is radiated away, and most of
the RF is converted to heat by atmospheric damping. For some frequencies
the damping is less and the signal can be reflected back and forth between
the layers. This frequency happens to be 7,83Hz.

I have not studied the Schumann resonance in detail, and I'm not a Phd.
Maybe some other forum members can offer a explanation to why the
measured result frequency is different from the predicted one.

GL.

tim123

Quote from: Groundloop on December 14, 2013, 03:13:00 AM
When a real measurement is different from the predicted theoretical value, then one must
conclude that the theory is wrong.

Agreed.

I like your theory, but the observed frequency remains something of a mystery...

I suppose I'll just have to put it on the back-burner, and see what turns up...