New magnet powered perpetual motion machine

[dradak1]

...
"Yes if your thing is real, - and is seems so, for you continue developing the pendulum and you reply -, certainly my magnets are not suffient. Too much weight for too little force. So I intend to buy some neodymium material, and try again. But I'm not quite sure what the best solution would be. Do you continue with your side 'quillotine system', or do you plan for something like I did, let's say the 'silent version'? Adding weight above the pivot is a good point... i'll try it..."

See further YouTube comments page:
http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=SZjNbjhxgt4

Anand Aadhar free energy research pages:
http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/index.html

Congratulation Anand - your replacement for guillotine - looks better and definitely have less resistance. 
Also what about same polarity of magnets facing each other on bottom of pendulum and in center to not allow pendulum stop in center?

Thanks,

Dragan

[4Tesla]

I am sure there is simply a coil or two underneath of big swinging pendulum with minimum electronics like just a single transistor. It was widely used in 1980's "electronic" clocks  to drive ordinary balance wheel spring clock mechanism without winded spiral spring or gravity weight. D battery lasted there for a year or two. Basically approaching magnet makes an EMF voltage in sensing coil, which triggers a single pulse of driving current via transistor at right moment to propel the pendulum. Usually there is a positive feedback via power coil to sensing coil, which determines pulse duration. Nowadays there is a million methods to do the same. For instance sensor could be a Hall effect switch, etc.

Similar device has been demonstrated in Kinetica Museum London.  look at
http://www.galleri-finsrud.no/sider/mobile/foto.html


It all exciting to see but no overunity I am afraid.

Welcome to the forum.. yes, very cool device, but I have a feeling the two black items on the base are coils and a circuit witch are powered by a battery to keep it going.

4Tesla

[sillyfellow.wayne]

hello people. pleased to meet you :?)
t'is my first post in here.

so, genuine or fake ?
of course this video it's possibly a fake, however the principles are sound.

a decent pendulum is rather efficient, powered by gravity and only slow down due to friction (contact and air). easy to eliminate the air if in a vaccum, so in order to keep it going for aaaaaaages (technically still not perpetually tho) you only need add a little boost. and what better to add an additional boost than a natural magnet?
actually, i had this exact thought about ten years ago and thought of designs/arrangements very much like this one. nice and simple.
i just found this site today and am loving it so far, but i found watching that little video super creepy. but i suppose i shouldn't be surprised because often people do think of the same basic idea.

so i'll have to say:
genuine.

ps: of course i know you may not believe what i said, but i've moved forward a lot with my own work on what you're calling overunity devices, so if you interested, this is my stuff up to mid last year. (i've moved on again since this vid):

Conceptual Self Powering Generators
http://www.archive.org/details/ConceptGenerators_FullMovie

[OscarMeyer]

So this thin a fake?  Or is it real?

[AnandAadhar]

I've tried to improve my replication with a more responsive side lever with stronger magnets at a greater distance on top, but that only led to a greater obstruction of the pendulum by the magnetic force. So the case suggests a fake as far as I am concerned.

But still my failure is no proof of impossibility. There is also Finsrud proving and defending the same time restlessness of the magnetism/gravity balance. Think of relativism that is also based upon a failure, the failure namely to prove the ether (Michelson and Morley). But the ether still might exist even though not proven with mirrors measuring the speed of light because in the same medium (of space) the speed of light is isotropically the same in all directions. Thus relativism might be a rationalization of incapacity (a neurotic symptom) and so the same way also the denial of Delk and Finsrud are thus also possibly neurotic. I am a psychologist and I can tell you that it is difficult to distinguish the sociopath cheating you from your own neurosis of nerdish doubt compensation. Neurosis and psychopathology are two sides of the same coin. The sociopath uses that weakness and tries to prove - and enjoy - that your belief in the ether and your effort for PM conversion with it is simply stupid. That is one of the reasons I am engaged in this business. Most people here in this forum have no clue about these subtleties and fall into valuing for or against. But I think doubt - not being neurotic - must be defended as the scientific foundation of all research.

AA

So this thin a fake?  Or is it real?