Hairpin Project

[resonanceman]

you are using classical physics to describe an electron but electrons do not follow classical mechanics.

an electron is statically 'smeared' in its orbit it does not 'revolve' around an atom. it pretty much looks like a perfect soap bubble and multiple electrons around a complex atom looks like a soap bubble inside a soap bubble inside a soap bubble and on and on. this soap bubble can change shape according to pressure exerted on its field, only 'free' electrons can become point particles and or wave particles.

the only way to make bound electrons become point particles is to drop the temperature down to where the electron has little or no energy but then they tend to act as singularities and become BEC.

electrons are inherently lazy and won't do work unless you force them to do work. like with 'all' forms of energy, it only likes the path of 'least' resistance. this is the reason why electrons smear themselves around an atom is so they do not have to do work revolving around an atom such as that described in classical mechanics. they are lazy slaves!

onthecuttingedge

I like the idea of electrons looking like bubbles ......but that does  bring up some questions.
You siad only free electrons  can become particles ........
Does this mean that the electron  is a wave when it is around the nucleus?
WHen  there are several electrons in the same orbet do they share the same bubble?
I understand  that the size of the orbit is determined by the energy level of the atom.  I also understand that  the orbits have set sizes.....there is a specific mumber of set orbits and nothing in between ......does  this mean that when an atom  gains or looses energy the  bubble bursts and reforms  at a different level?

I also do not know how any  of this stuff works with  my theory.... according to my theory  the hyper  electrons   would behave just like  normal electrons.......so they to would  be bubbles

As for  angular motion of mass  being transformed into energy ......that kind of flies out the window  with hyper electons or displacment current. .......they have no measurable mass........but they do have energy

gary

[resonanceman]

Hey Resman
Its a pic of Don Smiths device. I was hammered to see it.  I have been looking into the Bertonee transformers but no luck. I wanted to see what that bolt connection was. There are already 2 thick neon wires coming out, and I assume those are the output, but that terminal may be a gnd.   But it was interesting to see that there.
I hope it is a spark gap function.

Mags

It would be great  if we could find somone with some experience using  them for  a hairpin

I have been looking for good hairpin videos......I will watch for them.


gary

[onthecuttingedge2005]

onthecuttingedge

I like the idea of electrons looking like bubbles ......but that does  bring up some questions.
You siad only free electrons  can become particles ........
Does this mean that the electron  is a wave when it is around the nucleus?

yes, an electron is a 'static bubble wave' when in orbit around a nucleus.

WHen  there are several electrons in the same orbet do they share the same bubble?

I think they divide themselves smeary to form one bubble. they would emit some of their energy so their bubble membrane could be shared with another membrane.

I understand  that the size of the orbit is determined by the energy level of the atom.  I also understand that  the orbits have set sizes.....there is a specific mumber of set orbits and nothing in between ......does  this mean that when an atom  gains or looses energy the  bubble bursts and reforms  at a different level?

bursting of bubbles is a very good analogy for Quantum Mechanics, I believe it comes close to what actually happens. it is an energy bubble that bursts and reshapes itself into orbit.

I also do not know how any  of this stuff works with  my theory.... according to my theory  the hyper  electrons   would behave just like  normal electrons.......so they to would  be bubbles

this is quite common, not even Quantum Mechanics know why it works either, all they know is it just does, they about freaked out when they did the double slit experiment, somebody shot a wad that day.

As for  angular motion of mass  being transformed into energy ......that kind of flies out the window  with hyper electons or displacment current. .......they have no measurable mass........but they do have energy

gary

technically an electron should only be a sum of its parts when annihilated, Physics say that an electron is a fundimental particle even though it can be broken down into a simpler form from a positron to electron annihilation converted to Gamma Radiation.

below is what a single undisturbed hydrogen atom would look like if you could see it by itself and close up.

[amigo]

Hello,

I read the thread and thought to post my observations.

To begin with, I am not sure GDTs will work well as spark gaps as they are made to provide surge protection when a spike occurs but not on a continuous basis as your application might require.

Has anyone actually looked at the spec sheet for them or the link that was posted (http://www.citel.us/gas_distcharge_tubes_overview.html) explaining their operation. Please note the four operating domains and also on the next page the fairly broad dynamic area. Both might be problematic in your configuration.

Also, you need to remember that you will be pulsing hundreds if not thousands of times per second. The physical limit GDT can withstand before a breakdown occurs needs to be determined...

In any case, as I have also been researching various spark gaps and contemplating building all kinds of evacuated tubes with gases (ie. Nitrogen), I stumbled upon a solid-state spark gap using a SIDAC.

Not sure if anyone has seen this one already, but it looks very sound, not to mention it has already been tested and worked out:

http://drsstc.com/~sisg/

(PDF: http://drsstc.com/~sisg/files/SISG.pdf)

[sparks]

     How can the electron be a bubble it is a point scource of charge.  It occupies no space. It messes with space. Just like a photon messes with space.  The basic premise of quantom mechanics is that the photon represents units of inertia.  E=mc2 basically says that energy is inertia.  When inertia or mass velocity is converted into photons it will follow Einsteins formula.  The electron in a 1s orbital has more massveloity than one in the valance or conductive bands ever thought of having.  The electron may be smeared into a bubble field but I assure you that bubble is not just floating.  It is spinning like a top at near the speed of light along two axis of rotation.  While spinning say east to west creating an axis running north to south it is quite easy for the inertial field to also be spinning north to south at the same time. Or the axis created by the first spin also spinning.
The precessional velocity equal to or greater than the east west spin.  The electron must spin through 720 degrees to return to its original position.  Physics professor once said this is counterintuitive.  Tell that to a pitching coach explaining how to throw a mean curve ball to a kid playing farm team baseball.  I always go with by intuition.  The brain runs subroutines and figures out alot of shit for us before we try to find reasons for feeling this way or that about a certain situation.  We already know the solutions.  I always go with my gut response.  99percent probablity that you are right.