Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump

[pauldude000]

If you're all interested in this type of 'rodin' coil then look to the gelinas patent 4,429,280 and read about curl free magnetic vector field and the properties of toroidal coils. Its been there and done that circa 1984. My challenge stands, put up or shut up, no excuses, the first model was not good enough, I need to refine this or that, please give me more attention, yada yada

You are as bad as the rest of them....

What in your mind makes you think this coil is a 'rodin' coil?

What evidence do you have of this?

Let me guess, like those you spout off about, you automatically assume it HAS to work off of zero point energy? Maybe that you ALONE understand what a 'kick' or 'squeeze the hose' or a thousand other things refer to? Are you a mystic? Or maybe a Teslaite?

All I know is that a year ago I became absolutely disgusted with the egotism, not brains, being displayed here. Ego's which bruised to hurt feelings and outrage with the slightest disagreement or perceived criticism, let alone actual logical argument. Make no mistake, I am talking about the critics as much as the believers.

The supposed 'experts'??

In ALL of my time here I only met a VERY small handfull whom demonstrated the attitude which qualifies one as a professional. Hartiberlin, Loner, and one or two others.... total. I do not speak about those whom I have not interacted with, just those I have.

This isn't an episode of 'Guiding Light', "As The Stomach Churns', or any other soap opera. This is scientific research, in most part done by amateurs yes, but actual research none the less.

Those whom get ticked off because someone like hartiberlin injects notes of criticism and scientific method? ......

Too bad. Get over yourselves. Quit acting like children and more as serious adults.

To the skeptics whom don't believe it is even possible without even investigating the phenomenon? .....

Too bad. Get over yourselves. By all mean leave. The ONLY reason you are here anyway is to cause problems.


Don't like like what I just said? Did it hurt your 'po wittle feewings'?

Too bad, as I am sick to death of ego trips, and adults behaving like three year old children.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@ramset

Yes, I had headache, was sick and dizzy. Late last night I went to bed but I had to call them. They took me in and put me on oxygen, got 2 bottle infusions and told them to take me home sometime in the morning. Too many drunks there.

By all means please be careful of various glue / plastic / paint / coating fumes in enclosed spaces. They can actually kill you.

I came close with deft fumes years back without even knowing it while varnishing some cabinets. All of a sudden, I just realized that it is not normal to not be able to stand up.......

I am glad you are ok.

Paul Andrulis

[bullsnbears1]

I'm going to build this. I've got ideas for both of the problems.

I don't need angles any more obviously, but I'm a bit confused about the desired # of windings

Ah crap. I wish I would have listened to you. Forget the adjustable coil thing... looks cool though. Mighta worked if you were coiling fishing filament or something. Guess that's why I'll always be a noob.

[Magluvin]

Bulls
Actually Noob, lol, jump out of the box for a min, now, we know that the primary inside the tube is not near the secondary so we assume it has no affect on the secondary. So the inner primary web does not necessarily have to angle in the direction that we know here. Lets say that we set our first outer tube primary at the 45deg and it goes over the top for the first strand of inner primary, and have that inner strand go down the inside of the tube at the same angle with the outer strand. Now something will have to be thought out with what happens to get back on track for the next outer strand, but it should be close to getting your adjust ability to function.

But probably the easier way to test for better angles is to just lay 2 wires on a jig that allows to change the angle of 1 of the wires. If the effect is pronounced as told, then that effect should be able to be seen with just 2 wires with some type of equipment.  Back when they were just discovering all this stuff, they had made meters and test equipment that dont come close to what we had 50 years ago let alone now, but those guys had found things that we only dream of here. So maybe figure a way to run several parallel primaries flat and spaced, which is another parameter that needs study, and have a single secondary to test across those primaries.
If the effect with everything proper shows good on a coil, then that same config should show good on the flats.
I say this being that what we seem to be concerned with is the outer primary and secondary, spacing and crossing angles.
Im looking for a scope at the moment anda couple other useful pieces of equipment for these projects. If I had it now, I would give it a go.

And with the adjustable coil, if you research the idea of the inner primaries angling with the outer to be able to twist, the part about getting back on track will have to follow a path that does not affect the primary any differently than the prescribed coil method, as in primary wires should not touch or intersect with each other.

Gates
Good to hear your ok.  Miss Moneypenny was worried and Q has a new button for the Aston for you.  ;]

Magluvin 07

[Magluvin]

Oh Yea Noobs, lol  noob is new to me so its funny.    Being that the inner and outer have different geometeries, maybe a foam can be used to squeeze out the slack of the inner primaries or a RUBBER BAND. Sounds nuts but just thought of it. Still thinking.  I like adjust ability.

Im still on the hunch of single and multiple strands on the flats to make some science, er sense of it all. =]

Once you take in such info that is posted in this thread, it is hard to believe many aspects of it when compared to what we are taught. I forget that sometimes.

Magluvin 07