Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump

[gadgetmall]

Actually Gadget, Even though it is wrong, now that I think about it, HOW did you get it that way? I am in my mind trying to see the path that the thread would follow an its a physical impossibility!  Without some fangled routing, my guess by seeing it, it looks like a single loop from one hole to another. Athough I cannot see under the tape.
Im not making fun of your build, its just fact, how did you do that?   lol =]

Mags

WEll . Yes i know the Build for Stephan was wrong and he said it didn't work . I wound this just like a toroid ,one singe wire for the primary,in around in around . . Picture this as a toroid and i wound around the sides and insides .  . It looks like the one he made for Stephan . It appears to me he wound the same but i will accept it is wrong and re read the thread again . And i just was curious if a smaller version could be made and the paper roll was  handy . I also realize its one of the "crapiest : lol coils i ever wound 

The Beauty of Alex's Electronics skills is that you can ask him what you need a circuit can do and he He can make it work almost instantly . I have Great respect for his EE abilities and consider him the best i have seen in 30+ years . I also respect Other's Idea's as well  but when we are dealing with unconventional free energy it's really unexplored territory not written in stone or paper and he was the only one to come up with a schematic  and very fast at that !


Gadget

[ramset]

Tony,
I don't  know if you believe in a higher power in this world?
But I do.
All I can do at this point is pray.

I am

Chet

[skcusitrah]

@skcusitrah,

I DO listen to what Earl has to say. And I'm NOT arrogant, and very willing to LEARN something new.

But we are not here to discuss my person or Earl. We are here to promote free energy. I explained
my reason to why I designed the circuit like it is. I also explained why I did choose to use the
resistor values I did use. It is a shitty little circuit and not important in the long run.

Alex.

The drive circuit can be improved by adjusting the base resistor and adding the parallel cap as has been mentioned and backed up with a reasonable reference.

YOU are talking only about the DC HFE and current requirements, and ignoring the switching characteristics and the recommendations made from an experienced designer.

Show some respect and gratitude for the suggestion, your argument/explanation is incomplete.

[Earl]

@Everybody

I am ready with the coil and stop here with the experimenting and moving to design a complete driving circuitry with ordinary devices, variable duty cycle on each channel. I'll test it in simulator, build it on the breadboard and test it in reality as well by driving the coils and come back with the results.

Good idea.  I suggest considering 4 channels instead of 3, in spite of the extra work involved in still another winding.  The reason for this suggestion is that it is so much easier to create quadrature signals with digital circuitry than 3 phases.  Additionally, in Nature I am not aware of her using 120 degrees whereas quadrature and orthogonality are found everywhere in Nature and in mathematics.  In my opinion, synchronously clocked shift registers have considerable advantages over decade counters.  See my circuit pages.

Another suggestion is not to force using phi or Phi (golden mean) in the conception or construction, but to keep this ratio in mind just in case it should happen to fit naturally into your design, rather than just picking some dimension or some ratio or some angle.

My 10 cents worth.

May the Force be with you.

Earl

[agentgates]

Tony,
I don't  know if you believe in a higher power in this world?

I know more about that you'd presume I do. That is why I came forward to the public and asked everybody to save everything on their computer I write and send photos, later vids.

@Earl

Yes quadrature is a good point. I was also thinking about that yesterday to wind it with 4 but I had to move to larger diameter with the tube. I went to the post office to buy larger mailing tubes but they don't have at the moment. No supplies for days due to the extreme wheather (snowing, frost, unmaintained roads, accidents). All I've got in larger diameter is acrylic tube (127mm, see the latest photo). It is not easy to wind even 3 on it as it is clear and you see cobwebs everywhere after 2 is done.

So yes the 4 is a good point. Also the more channel you have the smoother the output will be and the less power you need to keep it running. But yet the more channels require larger tube to keep the spaces between the wires and avoid the "echo". The winding is going in zig-zag to create a working state outside and a resting (accelerating) inside. It gives a picosecond timing and I don't know if you saw my last scopeshots - with the 6 split-channel version coil - that clearly indicated what I wanted to know whether it makes an infuence on the spike. Yes, so the full circle is the most efficient so far. No noise and loss.

I will certainly look into the 4-channel version later with larger tube and varied geometries.