Solid State Orbo System

[lumen]

While I endure the epic wait for my core to cross the pond and get to my doorstep, I'll get my circuit ready for its arrival.

I'm thinking of setting up a parallel resonant circuit to drive the coil - wouldn't that pretty much nullify most of the power requirements for pulsing the core?

Parallel resonant tank circuit. That is what I was going to try as soon as I finished my current CNC lathe project.

Wind the coil with two passes of heavy gauge wire, one pass advancing around the core clockwise and the second layer advancing counter clockwise, with the same number of turns in each pass. This should eliminate any projected flux in the parallel plane.

Then, check the inductance with the magnets in place, and calculate the required capacitor for a good frequency somewhere in the range of your frequency generator.

Connect the frequency generator coupled with a small value signal feed capacitor, and tune it on the scope watching for the expanding peaks as it becomes resonate.

Once resonate, lower it into a section of copper pipe and see if the externally shorted flux has any influence on the resonate frequency and how far it would need to be re-tuned to again become resonate. Check the new resonate frequency and compare it to the original.

Rotate the coil within the copper tube and find the position of greatest change and least change to evaluate the overall emission field direction and relationship to the input power.

In a resonate state, you should not need to recover any of the coils EMF, since it is already used to enforce the resonate state.

Well, at least that's the way I would do it. It's all for fun!

[gotoluc]

Hi Groundloop

I started a topic for the self running coil I was telling you about.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8892

Luc

[exnihiloest]

also without external flux vector potential is not zero  ... 
http://jnaudin.free.fr/vpexp/index.htm

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0143-0807/2/3/008

There is a vector potential around a toroid. The Aharonovâ€"Bohm effect is a very weak effect that is related to it.
Nevertheless it doesn't cause any force on an permanent magnet!
Or please give us references about macroscopic effects of the vector potential without B/E fields.

[gravityblock]

There is a vector potential around a toroid. The Aharonovâ€"Bohm effect is a very weak effect that is related to it.
Nevertheless it doesn't cause any force on an permanent magnet!
Or please give us references about macroscopic effects of the vector potential without B/E fields.

That's about the same as saying, show me the effects of gravity without mass, lol (we can't show you the effects of acceleration from gravity without having a large mass to cause a curvature in space-time).  You're statement above makes it clear you don't understand potentials and fields.  The E and B fields can be derived from the potential A, but the potential can not be derived from the E and B fields.

The Aharonovâ€"Bohm effect shows that the local E and B fields do not contain full information about the electromagnetic field, and the electromagnetic four-potential, A, must be used instead. 

By Stokes' theorem, the magnitude of the Aharonovâ€"Bohm effect can be calculated using A alone or using E and B alone. But when using E and B, however, the effect depends on the field values in a region from which the test particle is excluded, not only classically but also quantum mechanically.

In contrast, the effect depends on A only in the region where the test particle is allowed. Therefore we can either abandon the principle of locality (which most physicists are reluctant to do) or we are forced to accept the realization that the electromagnetic potential offers a more complete description of electromagnetism than the electric and magnetic fields can.

In classical electromagnetism the two descriptions were equivalent. With the addition of quantum theory, though, the electromagnetic potential A is seen as being more fundamental or "real"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharonov-Bohm_effect

GB

[Bruce_TPU]

Hello ALL,

I tried out one of Luc's ideas by placing air gaps at most of the areas that I had magnets touch coils or toroids and you know what..... My input power dropped by 1 watt.  It is now running steady at .170 A @ 12 V.  Also at the same time, my output amperage rose by a third.

Tonight I am building a new input circuit that should give me an input of 1.5 V @ .170 A for a total INPUT wattage of 0.255 watts.

Please remember that I have yet to use electronic switching...LOL  I am saving that for last, and it will hopefully put me into OU land.  But for now, I continue day after day to optimize as I use a rotor to switch between 50 and 70 Hz.   

Cheers,

Bruce
http://www.energyfreedomreport.com