Solid State Orbo System

[jaculat]

Bruce sorry I didn't fully answer to your question...

I used Naudins circuit based on ne555, buz11 but instead 8V stabilizer I've used Lm 317 but on clip it's without it because it drops voltage by around 1,5V and this battery was bit to week (I'm using it when I'm connecting big 12V battery to make voltage 6-6,5V). When I'll finish main generator (2 missing big magnets + proper pickup coils) I'll separate 555 powering from buz11 powering for better IN/OUT power measurement. I'm working on website where I'll publish all detailed info ASAP...

[synchro1]

Here's a patent with images to the "figure-8 configuration" I previously posted, http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=downfile&id=378

It appears both patents are using the same concept with slight modifications.  I think the same individuals have a few more similar patents along the same line.

GB

The aperture or curved slot in the toroid material, through which a wire coil is wound as a reluctance switch in this patent is a tremendous input cost saver. Imagine a Toroid with two such windings at opposite ends of the Toroid, and a magnet stack in the middle. Energizing these miniature windings at each end of the Toroid would raise the reluctance at the point where the magnets touch the Toroid to the saturation point, demagnetizing the hemispheres to each side. A coil wrap around the Toroid like the one currently used to energize and saturate the entire core could then be used as an output coil. Cop's of the Figure Eight Energy Generation Apparatus reportedly exceed 400. Input current could be reduced to such a low level with the addition of their aperture coil wrapped reluctance switch method at each end of the stand alone Toroid, so as to achieve even higher Cop's.   

The magnets would have to be right at or just slightly below saturation level strength. A few thin copper coil wraps right around the toroid at each end of the magnets would be enough to increase reluctance at those points to completely block the flux path to the remainder of the toroid. Pulse width and frequency of these tiny wraps would have to be timed and fashioned to seat the power inside the new hysteresis curve. It would work a bit differently from JLN's version, with the magnet here supplying nearly all the power and the input at a bare minimum. Two output coil wraps, one to each side of the reluctance switches could be connected to allow for more accurate spacing. Gangs of these toroids could run off the same circuit with just a very very small amount of input. Switch input could be gauged to keep the cycle at the high non linear end of the M H curve.

[Bruce_TPU]

Happy Sunday Everyone,

Well, I continue to wait on my L Meter.  It has shipped from Hong Kong and I do expect it to arrive any day.

In the meantime, a couple of things.  Playing around with a .082uF  630 VDC Metal Poly Cap, I set my output up as a tank.  (not sure of resonance until L Meter arrives) and the voltage rose to 74 VAC.  This was new, because the highest non load voltage I had achieved was about 31 - 32 volts before this.  This was running at 12 V input.

I think it is just converting milliamps to voltage here and not sure of any benefit.

Now, I did notice an interesting thing, that the center solonoid winding that is inserted down through the center of the Brooks fields as an inside bias, that if I attempt to tap off of that in any kind of way, my output amps drop to next to nothing.  So.o.o, I think that this is the first coil that I will make a resonant tank out of and see if its ringing doesn't affect the output for the positive.

I am quickly coming to a close on any further "optimizations" aside from the big one of resonance.  If I can drop the input power while bumping output even a little more with resonance, that would be deemed by me as successful.

Lastly, I am going to have to build a 555 timer with freq adj and pw adjustment.  Alex has sent me a circuit.  I am going to order parts this week and begin work on it.  It will be the final and best opportunity to achieve the goal.  I have no intention of having to use calculus to show proof of overunity.  In that case, I would not even enter it.  Simple math of power (wattage) in versus power out.  Either it will or it won't.  I feel I have done a lot to optimize or "amplify" the output to the greatest extent possible.  Now, if a higher frequency input and high frequency switching, drops input power and raises output by a bit, I may actually cross that bridge of COP >1...LOL  If not, then I have learned a great deal that can be applied to another project...    P.S.  On a side note...don't think nothing is being done with the TPU...experiments are ongoing by others, using intermodulation to produce those wonderful harmonics.  One day I hope to have experimental proof.  Anywho, that is for another day...LOL

I might make a video this week showing SSG3 in operation in 12 volt mode...LOL, it is one noisy, vibrating contraption!

Cheers,

Bruce

[synchro1]

Closer examination of the Figure Eight patent reveals a single hole in an earlier version. This looks pretty easy to do; Just drill about an 1/8th inch hole to start somewhere in the middle of the Toroid material, then wrap a very thin copper wire to the inside. The magnets, gauged in power to nearly but not saturate the material would be placed against the edge of the Toroid as usual, in adjacency with a spacer gap in between. Pulsing the tiny inductor coil reluctance switch should generate power if one were to place the toroid over a copper wire wound output coil, with much less input then the larger wrap. Once again this would work backwards, with the magnets nearly saturating the toroid and the reluctance switch setting the control point for the demagnetization.

Two tiny inductors, one at each end with a horseshoe magnet clamped to the toroid would allow for tank resonance between the two, reducing input even less. The output coil could simply be wound directly over the toroid like the current inductor.

@Bruce- your new 555 timer circuit with pulse width and frequency adjustment might power a tiny reluctance switch with very little input.
If overunity eludes you, you might care to try this approach with a finemet noncrystalline toroid core.

[LarryC]

Lastly, I am going to have to build a 555 timer with freq adj and pw A.  Alex has sent me a circuit.  I am going to order parts this week and begin work on it. 

Check out the 'Velleman dc to pulse width modulator' on google. It is a complete kit and has freq adj and Pw adj. Cheap as $22.00 before shipping. I've used it for years with no problems.

Regards, Larry